The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous because the Trial Court had already decided the matter previously.
The criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed as infructuous pending disposal of the matter in the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:35373]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6527/2016 CNR: RJHC020112572016 | URN: CRLMP / 10436U / 2016
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
02/09/2026
[CRLMP-6527/2016]
[2026:RJ-JP:35373]
(2 of 2)
The present misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioners under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR No.658/2016 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar District Jaipur East.
As per the status report, the matter has already been decided by the learned Trial Court on 06.06.2018 & therefore, the present misc. petition has rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
Ordered accordingly.
Accordingly, the present misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
5/SAURABH
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petition for quashing the FIR is maintainable given that the matter has already been decided by the Trial Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rameshwar Meena
Ramkaran Meena
Ankit Meena
Naina Meena
Shakuntala Meena
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
