Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR registered at Police Station Muhana for offences including Sections 498-A, 354-B, 323, 341 and 34 IPC, alleging false assertions. The court held the FIR's allegations could not so be characterised at this stage and dismissed the petition applying Bhajan Lal guidelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:20201]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5201/2019
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Jagmeet Singh |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP |
| Mr. Sanjay Mehla with | |
| Ms. Sunita Mehla |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
13/05/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:20201]
[CRLMP-5201/2019]
(2 of 2)
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
PRATEEK/9
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR alleging offences under Sections 323, 341, 354-B, 498-A and 34 IPC should be quashed as a bundle of false assertions.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal & Ors.Applied
1992 supp (1) SCC 335 · Who else cites this
5 provisions across 1 enactments
Himmat Singh Maan
Shakti Singh
Dhanpati
State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
Shailja
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
