This order dismisses criminal miscellaneous petitions as infructuous having become devoid of purpose due to a compromise arrived at between the parties.
Miscellaneous petitions dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:35237]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3847/2019 CNR: RJHC020520112019 | URN: CRLMP / 6900U / 2019
Geeta D/o Shri Ghasiram Fulwariya, R/o Village Padukala, Police Station Padukala, District Nagaur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7832/2019 CNR: RJHC021085902019 | URN: CRLMP / 14465U / 2019
Dr. Jayanti Mala W/o Shri Prabhat Kanvaria, D/o Shri Surajmal, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Plot No.108, Bhagwati Nagar Ii, Kartarpura, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
(2 of 2)
[2026:RJ-JP:35237]
[CRLMP-3847/2019]
Nagar, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Sudhir Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
01/09/2026
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the compromise has been arrived at between the parties.
In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the present miscellaneous petitions have become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
Accordingly, the present miscellaneous petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
58-59/SAURABH
Geeta D/o Shri Ghasiram Fulwariya
Jayantimala W/o Shri Prabhat Kanwariya
State Of Rajasthan
Jayantimala W/o Shri Prabhat Kanwariya
Prabhat Kanwariya
Tulsiram Kanwariya
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
