Complainant's Section 138 NI Act complaint was dismissed in default and accused acquitted. Revision against acquittal was held not maintainable; only criminal leave to appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC lies. The High Court dismissed the petition with liberty to file such appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1195/2020
Uma Shankar Sharma S/o Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, R/o C-121, Mangal Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr.RajKumar Sharma(through VC) |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr.N.S. Dhakar, PP |
| Mr.Shubham Agarwal |
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
06/04/2026
[CRLMP-1195/2020]
(2 of 3)
[CRLMP-1195/2020]
(3 of 3)
the Limitation Act, the same would be decided by the said Court in accordance with law, keeping in view of the provisions contained under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Aayush Sharma /47
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revision petition is maintainable against dismissal in default of a complaint and acquittal of the accused for non-appearance of the complainant.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Uma Shankar Sharma
State of Rajasthan
M/s Kishan Sahay Meena through Proprietor Jai Kishan Meena
Jai Kishan Meena
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
