Allowed

Moin S/O Majeed v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Sept 2026CRLMB/9955/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed by three accused persons aggrieved by an order rejecting their bail. The High Court held that the allegations were not serious and the trial would take considerable time, making it just and proper to enlarge them on bail subject to stringent monitoring conditions.

What did the court decide?

Accused petitioners enlarged on bail subject to furnishing personal bond with sureties and compliance with strict monitoring conditions regarding assets and digital presence.

Moin S/O Majeed Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35438]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9955/2026 CNR: RJHC020591952026 | URN: CRLMB / 18453U / 2026

¶4

Moin S/o Majeed, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Dayna Ka Bas, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶5

Mustafa S/o Aajamdeen, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Daniyalpur Kheda, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶6

Saleem Khan S/o Nasru, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Basai, Tehsil Firozpur, Police Station Firozpur, District Nuh Mewat, Haryana. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ankit Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Sudesh Saini,PP

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA

¶13

Order

¶14

02/09/2026

¶15

This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioners Moin S/o Majeed, Mustafa S/o Aajamdeen, Saleem Khan S/o Nasru, who were arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.220/2026 dated 07.06.2026 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 303(2), 313, 112(2), 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel submits that the bail application filed by the petitioners was rejected by the learned Additional District &

[2026:RJ-JP:35438]

[CRLMB-9955/2026]

(2 of 5)

Sessions Judge, Brijnagar, Dist. Deeg, (Raj.) vide order dated 18.06.2026, thereafter, the petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S, 2023.

¶20

Learned counsel submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that charge-sheet has been filed on 19.08.2026, which does not disclose any serious complaints against them on '1930' portal. Learned counsel submitted that total amount of cyber fraud as alleged against all the petitioners has been quantified as Rs. 74,000/- approx. Apart that, there are no serious allegations of criminal nature against them and no more recovery is required to be made from them. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶21

Learned Public Prosecutor strongly oppose the bail application, however, fairly admits that there are no criminal antecedents of any nature under the IPC except a few, as noted in the charge-sheet, which are of petty nature.

¶22

After considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of the allegations as mentioned in the FIR, detailed investigation as carried out by the Investigating Officer, this Court noted that the allegations prima facie are not serious and trial will take considerable long time to conclude. Without commenting upon merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

¶23

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners Moin

[2026:RJ-JP:35438]

[CRLMB-9955/2026]

(3 of 5)

S/o Majeed, Mustafa S/o Aajamdeen, Saleem Khan S/o

¶28

Nasru shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

¶29

Accused-petitioners shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs 50,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 2. Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accusedpetitioners shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: - (i) Moveable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioners have in their name.

¶30

(ii) The accused-petitioners shall submit complete transaction statements of all their active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO.

¶31

The accused-petitioners shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer. 4. The accused-petitioners shall surrender their passport, if they have, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The accused-petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court. 5. The accused-petitioners shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO.

[2026:RJ-JP:35438]

[CRLMB-9955/2026]

(4 of 5)

The accused-petitioners shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in their possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order.

¶36

The accused-petitioners shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioners.

¶37

The accused-petitioners shall not create any social media account in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer.

¶38

The accused-petitioners shall mark their presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

¶39

In case of any change of residential address, the accusedpetitioners shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. 11. The accused-petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

¶40

The accused-petitioners shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever.

¶41

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions and further

[2026:RJ-JP:35438]

[CRLMB-9955/2026]

(5 of 5)

if the accused-petitioners are found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail.

¶46

(RAVI CHIRANIA),J

¶47

32/RINCHU

Moin S/O Majeed v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Moin S/O Majeed v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases