Allowed

Rampravesh S/O Jeetram @ Jeeta v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Sept 2026CRLMB/9871/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the criminal miscellaneous bail application of the petitioner, a private individual accused of offences under the BNS and Information Technology Act. About his be released on bail subject to onerous conditions including furnishing a bond and submitting detailed financial, digital, and electronic device disclosures.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail subject to furnishing a bond of ₹1 lakh with sureties and complying with conditions regarding financial, digital, and device disclosures.

Rampravesh S/O Jeetram @ Jeeta Vs State of Rajasthan — Intellectual Property | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35199]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9871/2026 CNR: RJHC020590022026 | URN: CRLMB / 18287U / 2026

¶4

Rampravesh S/o Jeetram @ Jeeta, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Sirathali, Police Station Brijnagar, District Deeg, State Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Confined In Jail, Deeg).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus ----Respondent

¶7

State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA

¶10

Order

¶11

01/09/2026

¶12

This criminal miscellaneous bail application has been filed by the petitioner Rampravesh S/o Jeetram @ Jeeta, under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR No.155/2026 registered at Police Station Nagar, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(2), 318(4), 338, 111(2)(a), 111(4), 111(5), 336(3), 340(2), 313 and 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2008. The bail application filed by the petitioner was rejected by order dated 10.06.2026 by the Additional Session Judge, Brijnagar, District Deeg.

¶13

Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and there are no serious allegations against him on '1930' portal. He submits that the Police after completing the investigation filed the charge-sheet on 25.08.2026

[2026:RJ-JP:35199]

[CRLMB-9871/2026]

(2 of 4)

and no criminal antecedents are found against him in the past. Learned counsel further submits that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are petty in nature. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the accused-petitioner be enlarged on bail, as the trial will take sufficiently long time.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application, however, could not dispute the fact that there are no criminal antecedents of any nature in the past except 1-2 complaints on '1930', which are not serious in nature.

¶19

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the contents of the FIR.

¶20

This Court, after considering the fact that the police, after completing the investigation, filed the charge-sheet, nature of allegations, noticing the fact that the petitioner is behind the bars since long, no serious allegations on '1930' were found against him and without commenting upon merits of the matter, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Rampravesh S/o Jeetram @ Jeeta shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

¶22

Each of the accused-petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of ₹50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

¶23

Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accused-petitioner shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: -

[2026:RJ-JP:35199]

[CRLMB-9871/2026]

(3 of 4)

(i) Movable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioners have in their name.

¶28

(ii) The accused-petitioner shall submit complete transaction statements of all of their active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO.

¶29

The accused shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer.

¶30

The accused-petitioner shall surrender their passport, if they have, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The accused-petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court.

¶31

The accused-petitioner shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO.

¶32

The accused-petitioner shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in their possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order.

¶33

The accused-petitioner shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration,

(4 of 4)

[2026:RJ-JP:35199]

[CRLMB-9871/2026]

websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioners.

¶38

The accused-petitioner shall not create any account on social media in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer.

¶39

The accused-petitioner shall mark their presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

¶40

In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court.

¶41

The accused-petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

¶42

The accused-petitioner shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever.

¶43

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions, & further if the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail.

¶44

(RAVI CHIRANIA),J

¶45

54/Monika

Rampravesh S/O Jeetram @ Jeeta v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rampravesh S/O Jeetram @ Jeeta v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases