Allowed

Salim Khan S/O Late Isak v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Sept 2026CRLMB/9509/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed by Salim Khan, arrested for offences under the BNS and IT Act. The court, noting the charge-sheet was filed and complaints were petty, directed release subject to strict conditions including financial disclosure, device listing, and restrictions on social media and digital communication.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with sureties, accompanied by strict conditions regarding financial disclosure, electronic device reporting, and restrictions on social media and travel

Salim Khan S/O Late Isak Vs the State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35020]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9509/2026 CNR: RJHC020576972026 | URN: CRLMB / 17620U / 2026

¶4

Salim Khan S/o Late Isak, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Ratnaki, PS Govindgarh District Alwar (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg District Deeg)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

	----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Surendra Singh
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. VijaySingh Yadav,PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA

¶10

Order

¶11

01/09/2026

¶12

This instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner Salim Khan S/o Late Isak, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR No.83/2026 dated 28.05.2026 registered at Police Station Jaluki, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the BNS and Section 66D of the IT Act, 2008.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the police, after conducting the investigation, has filed the charge-sheet against him on 24.08.2026. He further submits that there are certain complaints against the petitioner which are of petty nature. However, he fairly admits that the petitioner has no other criminal antecedents of any nature except those mentioned in the charge-sheet. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

[2026:RJ-JP:35020]

[CRLMB-9509/2026]

(2 of 4)

Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application and pointed out the cases as reported in the chargesheet.

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶19

This Court noted that the charge-sheet has already been filed, no recovery is required to be made, trial will take sufficiently long time to conclude and the complaints reported in the FIR are of petty nature. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without making any comments on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the present petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the instant bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Salim Khan S/o Late Isak shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

¶21

Petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.

¶22

Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accused-petitioner shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: -

¶23

(i) Movable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioner has in has name.

[2026:RJ-JP:35020]

[CRLMB-9509/2026]

(3 of 4)

(ii) The accused-petitioner shall submit complete transaction statements of all of his active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO.

¶28

The accused shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer. 4. The accused-petitioner shall surrender his passport, if he has, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The accused-petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court.

¶29

The accused-petitioner shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO. 6. The accused-petitioner shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in his possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order.

¶30

The accused-petitioner shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioners. 8. The accused-petitioner shall not create any social media account in the name of any person, domain name

[2026:RJ-JP:35020]

[CRLMB-9509/2026]

(4 of 4)

or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer.

¶35

The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

¶36

In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court.

¶37

The accused-petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

¶38

The accused-petitioner shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever.

¶39

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions, & further if the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail.

¶40

(RAVI CHIRANIA),J

¶41

190/RAHUL KUMAR

Salim Khan S/O Late Isak v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salim Khan S/O Late Isak v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases