Allowed

Tohid S/O Jahir v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Sept 2026CRLMB/9311/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court allowed two bail applications filed by accused persons under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. 2023. The court found the allegations petty after reviewing the FIR and charge-sheet. Consequently, the petitioners were released on bail subject to strict conditions regarding financial disclosure, electronic devices, and travel restrictions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners Tohid S/o Jahir and Taslim S/o Deenu enlarged on bail subject to personal bond, disclosure of assets, periodic transaction statements, surrender of passports and electronic devices, and st

Tohid S/O Jahir Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35410]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9311/2026 CNR: RJHC020565852026 | URN: CRLMB / 17090U / 2026

¶4

Tohid S/o Jahir, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Kaithwara, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg (Raj)

¶5

(Presently Accused In Judicial Custody At District Jail Deeg)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9568/2026 CNR: RJHC020571852026 | URN: CRLMB / 17771U / 2026

¶12

Taslim S/o Deenu, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dharmshala, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg (Rajasthan).

¶13

(At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶14

----Petitioner

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶17

----Respondent

¶18

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Azad Ahmed Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.

¶19

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA

¶20

Order

¶21

02/09/2026

¶22

These criminal miscellaneous bail applications have been filed by the petitioners Tohid S/o Jahir & Taslim S/o Deenu, under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023, who were arrested by the police in connection with the FIR No.0083/2026 dated 26.05.2026 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the

[2026:RJ-JP:35410]

[CRLMB-9311/2026]

(2 of 5)

offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2008. The bail applications filed by the petitioners were rejected by order dated 08.06.2026 by the Additional Session Judge, Kaman, District Deeg.

¶27

Learned counsel submit that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present cases and there are no serious allegations against them on '1930' portal. He submits that the Police, after completing the investigation, filed the charge-sheet on 26.05.2026 and no criminal antecedents are found against them. Learned counsel further submits that the allegations levelled against the petitioners are petty in nature. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the accused-petitioners be enlarged on bail, as the trial will take sufficiently long time.

¶28

Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail applications, however, could not dispute the fact that charge-sheet has been filed and there are no criminal antecedents of any nature in the past except 1-2 complaints on '1930', which are of petty nature.

¶29

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused contents of the FIR as well as conclusion in the charge-sheet.

¶30

This Court, after considering the fact that the police, after completing the investigation, has filed the charge-sheet, nature of allegations, the petitioners are behind the bars since long, no serious allegations on '1930' were found against them, and therefore, without commenting upon merits of the matters, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and

[2026:RJ-JP:35410]

[CRLMB-9311/2026]

(3 of 5)

deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

¶35

Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners - Tohid S/o Jahir & Taslim S/o Deenu shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

¶36

Each of the accused-petitioners shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of ₹50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

¶37

Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accused-petitioners shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: -

¶38

(i) Movable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioners have in their name.

¶39

(ii) The accused-petitioners shall submit complete transaction statements of all of their active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO.

¶40

The accused-petitioners shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer.

¶41

The accused-petitioners shall surrender their passport, if they have, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The

(4 of 5)

[2026:RJ-JP:35410]

[CRLMB-9311/2026]

accused-petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court.

¶46

The accused-petitioners shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO.

¶47

The accused-petitioners shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in their possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order.

¶48

The accused-petitioners shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioners.

¶49

The accused-petitioners shall not create any account on social media in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer.

¶50

The accused-petitioners shall mark their presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

¶51

In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court.

¶52

The accused-petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(5 of 5)

[2026:RJ-JP:35410]

[CRLMB-9311/2026]

The accused-petitioners shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever.

¶57

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions, & further if the accused-petitioners are found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bails.

¶58

(RAVI CHIRANIA),J

¶59

20/Monika

Tohid S/O Jahir v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tohid S/O Jahir v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases