Allowed

Farukh Alias Farri S/O Deena @ Deen Mohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Sept 2026CRLMB/7834/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Jaipur allowed a criminal bail application filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023. The Court directed the release of the petitioner on personal bond with sureties and imposed conditions regarding police reporting and a two-year negative record.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by executing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties, subject to conditions of police reporting and no new offenses within two years.

Farukh Alias Farri S/O Deena @ Deen Mohammad Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35407]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7834/2026 CNR: RJHC020476772026 | URN: CRLMB / 14290U / 2026

¶4

Farukh @ Farri S/o Deena @ Deen Mohammad, Age 55 Years, R/o Roopwas, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA

¶11

Order

¶12

02/09/2026

¶13

This criminal bail application has been filed by the petitioner Farukh @ Farri S/o Deena @ Deen Mohammad, aged about 55 years, under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.103/2026 dated 12.04.2026 registered at Police Station Nagar, District Deeg, Rajasthan for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) & 317(2) of B.N.S., 2023.

¶14

Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel submits that certain criminal cases of similar nature were registered against the petitioner in the year 2018 and he is on bail in all those matters. He further submits that there is no evidence on record against the petitioner in the FIR and without any basis, police arrested him on

[2026:RJ-JP:35407]

[CRLMB-7834/2026]

(2 of 3)

12.04.2026. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application, by submitting that there are 21 cases pending against the petitioner, which are of similar nature and the last case registered is of the year 2018.

¶20

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the contents of the FIR. 5. This Court, after considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, petitioner has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court in all the pending cases and without commenting upon merits of the case, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Farukh @ Farri S/o Deena @ Deen Mohammad shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case.

¶21

The petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned SHO of the Police Station twice a month for the entire period of

[2026:RJ-JP:35407]

[CRLMB-7834/2026]

(3 of 3)

the trial. The SHO shall maintain register to mark presence of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to appear twice in any month then the same shall be considered as breach and this bail shall stands cancelled automatically without reference to the Court.

¶26

It is further directed that in case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case within a period of two years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail.

¶27

(RAVI CHIRANIA),J

¶28

18/Monika

Farukh Alias Farri S/O Deena @ Deen Mohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Farukh Alias Farri S/O Deena @ Deen Mohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases