Dilawar @ Dilla S/O Khussi Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilawar @ Dilla S/o Khussi, R/o Bilahedi, Police Station Bhiwadi Phase Tritiya, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Khairthal-Tijara).

¶12

----Accused-Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP

¶17

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶18

Order

¶19

10/07/2026

¶20

These instant bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners against the order of learned trial Court dated 18.04.2026 under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 06/2026 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Thana, District Bhiwadi for the offence(s) punishable under Sections

[2026:RJ-JP:25959]

[CRLMB-7027/2026]

(2 of 3)

317(2), 317(4), 318(2), 318(4), 112(2) & 61(2) of BNS and Sections 66D of IT Act.

¶25

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long; charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedent against the accused-petitioner Haseen; that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶26

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners and submits that there are three criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner Dilawar @ Dilla. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties; and particularly keeping in view the fact that charge-sheet has been filed; that accused-petitioners Haseen and Dilawar are behind the bars since 26.02.2026 and 27.02.2026 respectively; that there are no criminal antecedent against the accusedpetitioner Haseen; that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

¶27

Therefore, these instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners

[2026:RJ-JP:25959]

[CRLMB-7027/2026]

(3 of 3)

Haseen S/o Jakar and Dilawar @ Dilla are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶32

It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence once in a month in the concerned police station.

¶33

In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶34

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶35

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶36

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶37

14-15/EKTA

Dilawar @ Dilla S/O Khussi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilawar @ Dilla S/O Khussi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit S/O Shri Shiv Prasad Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ram Gopal Agarwal S/O Shri Gendi Lal Agarwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh Kumar Rewar S/O Late Shri Tejaram Rewar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh S/O Rameshwar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Haseen S/O Jakar Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra S/O Surajmal Vs the State of Rajasthan