Allowed¶4

Sayar Singh S/O Sarjeet Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 May 2026CRLMB/5953/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sayar Singh v. State of Rajasthan; Rajasthan HC Jaipur; S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5953/2026 [CRLMB-5953/2026]; bail allowed under Section 483 BNSS; FIR No. 11/2026, P.S. Khatushyamji Sadar, District Sikar; offences/charge-sheet under B.N.S., 2023 Sections 126(2), 115(2), 119(1), 351(3), 3(5) & 308(3); custody since 13.02.2026; charge-sheet filed; personal bond Rs. 1,00,000/- plus two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each; no opinion on merits; Coram: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sangeeta Sharma; decided 06/05/2026.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioner Sayar Singh S/o Sarjeet Singh ordered to be released on bail under Section 483 BNSS, subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court and appearing on all dates of hearing. ¶4

Sayar Singh S/O Sarjeet Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶4

Issue for consideration

Whether the accused-petitioner Sayar Singh, arraigned in FIR No. 11/2026, P.S. Khatushyamji Sadar, District Sikar (B.N.S., 2023 offences, charge-sheet filed, in custody since 13.02.2026), should be enlarged on bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶2

Court's answer

Having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances, that the charge-sheet has already been filed, that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 13.02.2026, and that trial will take its own time, the Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail and allows the bail application under Section 483 BNSS.

¶4

Ratio / Principle

Release on bail is conditional on the accused-petitioner furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon.

¶5

Key takeaways

In case of breach of the aforementioned bail conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move for cancellation of bail before the concerned Court.ratio¶6
The observations made in the order are only for deciding the instant bail application and shall have no impact on the trial of the case in any manner.obiter¶7

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

BAIL ALLOWED (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5953/2026, decided 06/05/2026 by Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sangeeta Sharma, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench): Accused-petitioner Sayar Singh (aged about 22 years), in judicial custody since 13.02.2026 in FIR No. 11/2026, P.S. Khatushyamji Sadar, District Sikar, for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 119(1), 351(3) & 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 (charge-sheet filed under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 119(1), 351(3), 3(5) & 308(3) of B.N.S., 2023), enlarged on bail under Section 483 of BNSS on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, with liberty to the Public Prosecutor to seek cancellation on breach. Bail granted solely on grounds of charge-sheet having been filed, prolonged custody and trial consuming time, expressly without any opinion on the merits; observations confined to the bail application and without impact on trial.

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:19119]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5953/2026

¶4

Sayar Singh S/o Sarjeet Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Sanwalpur Police Station Khatushyamji Sadar, District Sikar (Presently In Judicial Custody At District Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur)

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor

¶8

----Non-petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anish Bhadala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶10

Order

¶11

06/05/2026

¶12

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 11/2026 registered at Police Station Khatushyamji Sadar, District Sikar for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 119(1), 351(3) & 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 in which chargesheet has been filed under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 119(1), 351(3), 3(5) & 308(3) of B.N.S., 2023.

¶13

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 13.02.2026; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore,

[2026:RJ-JP:19119]

[CRLMB-5953/2026]

(2 of 3)

prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶18

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accusedpetitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner.

¶19

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 13.02.2026; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sayar Singh S/o Sarjeet Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

[2026:RJ-JP:19119]

[CRLMB-5953/2026]

(3 of 3)

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶26

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶27

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶28

PUNEET KUMAR/34

Sayar Singh S/O Sarjeet Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sayar Singh S/O Sarjeet Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar S/O Pradeep Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Kumar S/O Hariram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ranjeet @ Mukesh S/O Hariram Vs State of Rajasthan

Navet Koli S/O Frances Koli Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajveer S/O Raghuveer Nath Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagwan Singh S/O Shri Motilal Bheel Vs State of Rajasthan