Allowed

Pintu S/O Lohre v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Jan 2026CRLMB/529/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three accused arrested after an FIR at New Mandi Hindaun police station sought regular bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Counsel argued no evidence showed organised gang activity and investigation was complete. Finding no objectionable features and noting prolonged incarceration and likely trial delay, the court allowed all three bail applications.

What did the court decide?

All three bail applications accepted; release on bail upon personal bond Rs. 50,000 plus two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, subject to monthly attendance at the police station on the 25th.

Pintu S/O Lohre Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:2214]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2/2026

¶4

Niranjan S/o Shivsingh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Rewai, Police Station New Mandi Hindaun City, District Karauli. (At Present Confined In District Jail Karauli).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 528/2026

¶11

Vasudev Singh S/o Ganga Sahai, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Foolwada, Police Station Sadar Hindauncity, District Karauli. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Hindauncity).

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 529/2026

¶17

Pintu S/o Lohre, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Shiv Colony Police Station Kotwali Karauli District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Hindaun City, Karauli).

¶18

----Petitioner

¶19

Versus

¶20

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶21

----Respondent

¶22

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma Mr. Lakhan Singh Jadoun Mr. N.K. Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP

¶23

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

19/01/2026

[2026:RJ-JP:2214]

[CRLMB-2/2026]

(2 of 3)

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq iFkd~&iFkd~ tekur izkFkZuk i= Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk& ubZ e.Mh fg.MkSu] ftyk& djkSyh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 558@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 13 jktLFkku lkoZtfud |wr v/;kns'k ,oa /kkjk 112(2) Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk esa is'k fd, x, gSaA

¶30

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo}ku~ vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks /kkjk 13 jktLFkku lkoZtfud |wr v/;kns'k ds varxZr fxj¶rkj dj /kkjk 112(2) Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk vkjksfir dh xbZ gSA bl lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij bl izdkj dk dksbZ rF; ugha gS fd izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k us la;qDr :i ls fdlh fxjksg dk lnL; gksrs gq, fujarjrk esa dksbZ vijk/k dkfjr fd;k gksA izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k yacs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgs gSa ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa yack le; yxus dh laHkkouk gS rFkk izdj.k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ gks pqdk gSA vr% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk,A

¶31

fo}ku~ yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk tekur vkosnuksa dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA cgl lquh xbZA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶32

bl izØe ij izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.kksa ij dksbZ fVIi.kh visf{kr ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ij vkjksfir vijk/k dh izdfr] mudh vfHkj{kk dh vof/k bR;kfn dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, eSa izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds tekur vkosnuksa dks Lohdkj fd, tkus ;ksX; le>rk gw¡A

¶33

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k 1- fujatu iq= f'koflag] 2- oklqnso flag iq= xaxklgk;] 3- fiUVw iq= yksgjs dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkrs gSa vkSj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj #i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o iPphl&iPphl gtkj #i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo”oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mudh fdlh vU;

[2026:RJ-JP:2214]

[CRLMB-2/2026]

(3 of 3)

izdj.k esa vko”;drk u gks] rks vfoyEc fuEu “krZ ij tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶38

“krZ%&

¶39

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k izR;sd ekg dh 25 rkjh[k dks] fopkj.k dh lekfIr rd] lacaf/kr iqfyl Fkkuk esa viuh mifLFkfr ntZ djk,axsA lacaf/kr iqfyl Fkkukf/kdkjh dks ;g funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd og izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh mifLFkfr ntZ djrs gq, fu;fer jftLVj dk la/kkj.k djsxk ,oa mDr mifLFkfr dh fjiksVZ mlh fnu lacaf/kr fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks fcuk fdlh foyac ds izsf"kr djsxkA ;fn izkFkhZx.k@ vfHk;qDrx.k mDr 'krZ dk mYya?ku djrs gSa] rks lacaf/kr yksd vfHk;kstd mDr vk/kkj ij izkFkhZx.k@ vfHk;qDrx.k dh tekur dks fujLr djus gsrq lacaf/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k vkosnu izLrqr djus dks Lora= jgsxkA

¶40

mDr tekur vkosnu mijksDr vuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSa ,oa izdj.k ls lacaf/kr izkFkZuk i=] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gksa] mDr tekur vkosnu ds lkFk fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA

¶41

bl vkns'k dh ,d izfr lacaf/kr Fkkukf/kdkjh dks l[r vuqikyuk gsrq Hksth tkosA

¶42

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶43

MOHIT/ 193-195

Pintu S/O Lohre v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pintu S/O Lohre v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harkesh S/O Surjya Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ameen S/O Lala Vs State of Rajasthan

Ghasi Lal Gautam S/O Lt. Shri Surajmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Niranjan S/O Shivsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhopal Singh S/O Murari Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Salman Khan Son of Rasid Vs State of Rajasthan