Allowed

Ashok Kumar S/O Laduram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Apr 2026CRLMB/5109/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second regular bail application by a probationer sub-inspector accused in an examination paper-leak case under cheating and public examinations provisions. The co-accused with identical allegations had been granted bail by the Supreme Court. The court granted bail subject to conditions including personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner admitted to bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, subject to stated conditions.

Ashok Kumar S/O Laduram Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:14725]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2^nd Bail Application No. 5109/2026

¶4

Ashok Kumar S/o Laduram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Mokhatara, Police Station Karda, District Jalore At Present R/o Sardar Patel Nagar, Opposite Gayatri School, Ward No. 21, Sanchore Police Station, Sanchore, District Jalore At Present Sub Inspector (Probationer) Reserve Police Line, Udaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined in Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus ----Respondent

¶7

State of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Tushar Bhatnagar,Adv.
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Anurag Sharma, Spl. PP with
		Mr. Anoop Meena, Adv.
		Mr. Akshat Sharma,Adv.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order

¶10

1.	Arguments Concluded On:	07/04/2026
2.	Order Reserved On:	07/04/2026
3.	Full Order/Operative Part Pronounced:	Full Order
4.	Pronounced On:	10/04/2026

¶11

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qä dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur çkFkZuk i= varxZr èkkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ¼èkkjk 439 na-ç-la-½ iqfyl Fkkuk Lis'ky iqfyl LVs'ku ¼,l-vks-th-½] ftyk ,Vh,l ,oa ,lvksth esa ntZ çFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 10@2024 vijkèk vUrxZr èkkjk 419] 420] 120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o èkkjk 4] 5] 6

[CRLMB-5109/2026]

[2026:RJ-JP:14725]

(2 of 4)

jktLFkku lkoZtfud ijh{kk ¼vuqfpr lkèku dk ç;ksx½ vfèkfu;e rFkk èkkjk 66D lwpuk çkS|ksfxdh ¼la'kksèku½ vfèkfu;e esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶16

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr izFke tekur izkFkZuk i= bl U;k;ky; }kjk vkns'k fnukad 09-02-2026 ds ek/;e ls foLr`r vkns'k ikfjr dj vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k x;k gSA

¶17

çkFkÊ@vfHk;qä ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku ;g rdZ jgk gS fd çkFkÊ@vfHk;qä dks bl izdj.k esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gS] og funksZ"k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) tks vkjksi gSa] ogh vkjksi lgvfHk;qDr euksgj flag ds fo#) Hkh gSa] nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k dh tekur bl U;k;ky; }kjk vkns'k fnukad 09-02-2026 dks vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh x;h FkhA lgvfHk;qDr euksgj flag dks ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ,l-,y-ihla[;k 3304@2026 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 23-03-3026 }kjk tekur dk ykHk fn;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk izdj.k euksgj flag ds leku gh gSA blds vfrfjDr lgvfHk;qDr iq:"kksRre nk/khp dh ,l-,y-ih- la[;k 1799@2026 o jktsUnz dqekj ;kno mQZ jktw dh ,l-,y-ih- la[;k 3152@2026 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 23-03-2026 }kjk ekuuh; mPPre U;k;ky; }kjk mudh tekur Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] izdj.k esa vR;f/kd xokg o vfHk;qDrx.k gSa] vHkh rd vkjksi fojfpr ugh gq, gSa] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj mls tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkosA

¶18

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fuEu fofu'p; izLrqr fd;s%&

[CRLMB-5109/2026]

[2026:RJ-JP:14725]

(3 of 4)

Manohar Singh Versus The State of Rajasthan Ors. Connected Matter; S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1157/2026; order dated 09.02.2026.

¶23

Purushottam dadhich versus state of rajasthan; SLP (crl.) No. 1799/2026; order dated 23.03.2026.

¶24

fo}ku fof'k"V yksd vfHk;kstd us bl rF; dks Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr o lgvfHk;qDr euksgj flag dk izdj.k leku gS rFkk euksgj flag dh tekur ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] ijarq izkFkhZ@vfHk;qä ds fo#) vkjksfir vijkèk dh xaHkhjrk dks –f"Vxr j[krs gq, ;g tekur çkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶25

eSaus nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA

¶26

orZeku izdj.k esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr v'kksd dqekj ij tks vkijkf/kd vkjksi gSa] ogh vkjksi lgvfHk;qDr euksgj flag ij Hkh gSaA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk lgvfHk;qDr euksgj flag dh vksj ls izLrqr ,l-,y-ih- la[;k 3304@2026 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 23-03-2026 ds ek/;e ls mldh tekur Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk izdj.k lgvfHk;qDr euksgj flag ds leku gh gSA

¶27

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k rFkk ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk leku izdfr ds vkijkf/kd vkjksi ds lgvfHk;qDr dh tekur Lohdkj fd;s tkus ds rF; dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

[CRLMB-5109/2026]

[2026:RJ-JP:14725]

(4 of 4)

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr v'kksd dqekj iq= yknwjke dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks] rks mls fuEu 'krksZa ds v/khu gLrxr izdj.k esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkos%&

¶32

1- izkFkhZ izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls xokgksa dks Mjk,xk ;k /kedk,xk ughaA

¶33

2- izkFkhZ fopkj.k ds nkSjku fcuk fdlh U;k;ksfpr dkj.k ds fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k vuqifLFkr ugha jgsxkA

¶34

3- izkFkhZ U;k;ky; dh vuqefr ds fcuk Hkkjr ugha NksM+sxkA

¶35

4- izkFkhZ tekur dh 'krksZa dk mYya?ku ugha djsxkA

¶36

;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk mDr 'krksZa dk mYya?ku fd;k tkrk gS rks fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks iznRr tekur lqfo/kk fujLr djus gsrq Lora= jgsxkA

¶37

(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J

¶38

MANISH SAINI /Res.

Ashok Kumar S/O Laduram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar S/O Laduram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramprasad Son of Hariram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Chandan Singh S/O Shri Devi Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Satyaveer Singh Adopted S/O Shri Indraj Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajkumar Yadav S/O Late Chotelal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Brijmohan Sharma S/O Shishupal Sharma, Vs State of Rajasthan

Rinku Yadav S/O Bijendra Singh Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan