Allowed

Kaluram S/O Ramratan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Mar 2026CRLMB/3991/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail sought under Section 483 BNSS for offences under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and the Rajasthan Bovine Animal Act. Court noted recovery was complete, petitioner had no antecedents and trial would take time; it granted bail with personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Kaluram S/O Ramratan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:11070]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3991/2026

¶4

Kaluram S/o Ramratan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bhaton Ka Naya Gaon, P.s. Nainwa, District Bundi. (At Present Accused Confined In Sub Jail, Nainwa).

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶8

----Respondent/State

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naman Yadav Mr. Piyush Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

16/03/2026

¶13

This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accusedpetitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 13/2026 registered at Police Station Nainwa, District Bundi for the offence(s) under Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 & 11(1)(D) of Prevention of Cruelty To Animals Act and under Sections 5/8 & 3/8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition Of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration Or Export Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; recovery has already been effected; He further submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 12.02.2026; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner; conclusion of trial may take a long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the

(2 of 2)

[2026:RJ-JP:11070]

[CRLMB-3991/2026]

bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶19

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.

¶20

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that recovery has already been effected; petitioner is behind the bars since 12.02.2026; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Kaluram S/o Ramratan is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶23

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶24

SHIVANI/114

Kaluram S/O Ramratan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaluram S/O Ramratan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saksham Khandelwal S/O Rajendra Khandelwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunny Babri S/O Veersingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Amol Chopra S/O Shri Pravesh Chopra Vs the State of Rajasthan

Bobby Singh S/O Shri Munna Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shobhag Urf Palit S/O Ramswaroop S/O Kailash Vs State of Rajasthan

Kulveer Mor S/O Baljeet Mor Vs State of Rajasthan