Allowed¶20

Kamlesh S/O Dhannalal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Jan 2026CRLMB/306/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application (CRLMB) No. 306/2026; Kamlesh v. State of Rajasthan; decided 08/01/2026 by Pramil Kumar Mathur, J.; bail under S. 483 BNSS in NDPS Act Ss. 8, 20, 25 case (FIR 180/2025, P.S. Sunel, Jhalawar); 9.08 gram smack alleged, contended below commercial quantity and recovered from co-accused; custody since 14.12.2025; RPGO Act antecedents; bail allowed, bond Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner Kamlesh S/o Dhannalal to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, with appearance before that Court on all dates till conclusion of the trial. ¶20

Kamlesh S/O Dhannalal Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:643]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 306/2026

¶4

Kamlesh S/o Dhannalal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Banda Jagir Police Station Kaamkheda District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawra (Raj).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Rohit Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Manvendra Singh Shekhawat,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶11

08/01/2026

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.180/2025 registered at Police Station Sunel, District-Jhalawar for offences under Sections 8, 20 and 25 of NDPS Act.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the present petitioner. The alleged contraband weighing 9.08 gram of smack, which is below the commercial quantity was recovered from the conscious possession of Ghanshyam and Vidhyasagar. Though the petitioner has two criminal antecedents registered under the RPGO Act but petitioner is behind the bars since

(2 of 2)

[2026:RJ-JP:643]

[CRLMB-306/2026]

14.12.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶19

On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner- Kamlesh S/o Dhannalal shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶22

Arun/49

Kamlesh S/O Dhannalal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamlesh S/O Dhannalal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohitash S/O Indraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Deepak Kumar Pradhan @ Dulu S/O Shri Madhav Pradhan Vs State of Rajasthan

Imran Khan S/O Aziz Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Govind @ Govind Sahai S/O Bhagwan Sahai Vs State of Rajasthan

Umashankar @ Uma S/O Amal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajat Ravikiran Toraskar S/O Shri Ravikiran Chintamani Toraskar Vs Narcotics Control Bureau