Mahendra Kumar S/O Shri Pooran Mal Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:15222]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2557/2026

Mahendra Kumar S/o Shri Pooran Mal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ramyawali, Police Station Aandhi, District Jaipur. (At Present Confined At Central/ District Jail Dausa).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Shandilya, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order

¶11

10/04/2026

¶12

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.0078/2025, registered at Police Station Baijupara, District Dausa, for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 140(3) and 109(1) of BNS and Sections 3(1)(v) and 3(1)(a) of SC/ST Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that prima facie offence under Section 109(1) of BNS is not made out against the accused-petitioner. It is also contended that injured Rakesh Meena submitted a compromise before the trial Court in which he has stated that the petitioner’s name was wrongly written and that the complainant does not want to pursue the case qua the petitioner and if the bail application of the accused-petitioner is allowed, then he has no objection. It is further contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since

[2026:RJ-JP:15222]

[CRLMB-2557/2026]

(2 of 3)

29.01.2026 and the investigation/trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accusedpetitioner may be allowed.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner along with other coaccused caused injuries to injured Rakesh Meena and in the X-ray report, two grievous injuries were found on the leg of the injured. It is further contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender and against him 15 criminal cases pertaining to various offences under IPC such as robbery, theft, etc., have been registered in various Police Stations, therefore, considering the facts of the present case and the conduct of the petitioner, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.

¶19

Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. In the trial Court, injured Rakesh Meena has submitted a compromise stating that he does not want to pursue the case against the petitioner and if the bail application of the petitioner is allowed, then he has no objection. The injuries sustained by the injured Rakesh Meena were also found to be grievous in nature but not dangerous to life and was not on a vital part, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Mahendra Kumar S/o Shri Pooran Mal, in connection with FIR No.0078/2025, registered at Police Station Baijupara, District Dausa, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal

[2026:RJ-JP:15222]

[CRLMB-2557/2026]

(3 of 3)

bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned S.H.O. before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶25

The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25^th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay.

¶26

The accused-petitioner is directed to submit his present address along with his mobile number to the concerned S.H.O. within 7 days from his release and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number he shall submit the same before the concerned S.H.O. and also before the concerned learned trial Court. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶27

A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance.

¶28

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶29

Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-32

Mahendra Kumar S/O Shri Pooran Mal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra Kumar S/O Shri Pooran Mal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Bawariya @ Kochya S/O Shri Ramkaran @ Karan Bawariya Vs State of Rajasthan

Vimlesh Meena S/O Gangasahay Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Deepu S/O Bhuraram Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishan Meena S/O Hanuman Sahay Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Bansilal Urf Prince S/O Shri Shankararam Vs State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Ranwa S/O Rajendra Singh Ranwa Vs the State of Rajasthan