The court dismissed a second bail application under Section 483 BNSS for an accused in an NDPS case. Relying on a co-accused's bail dismissal, the court held no distinction existed in their roles or stance and refused bail at that stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:20656]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 2208/2026
Jitendra Kumar S/o Suresh Kumar, Aged About 41 Years, R/o 9340, Katra Ganga Vishan, Goshala Road, Kishanganj Delhi110006 (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).
---Accused-Petitioner
Versus
DRI, Through Standing Counsel
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Rajveer Singh Gurjar |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mr. |
Bharat Vyas, ASG through VC with Ajatshatru Mina |
| Mr. | Rajat Chaudhary | |
| Mr. | Vikshyant Vijay | |
| Ms. | Anushka Khandelwal | |
| Mr. | Rakesh Chaudhary |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
15/05/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:20656]
[CRLMB-2208/2026]
(2 of 2)
(SAMEER JAIN),J
DEEPAK /s-156
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused-applicant is entitled to bail under Section 483 BNSS in an NDPS case involving 10.385 Kgs.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Santosh Saha Versus Directorate of Revenue IntelligenceReferred¶14
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 5193/2026 title Santosh Saha Versus Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jitendra Kumar
DRI
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
