Allowed

Vikram Singh Gurjar S/O Kishanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Feb 2026CRLMB/1457/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Four accused sought regular bail under Section 483 BNSS for alleged attempt to murder by ramming a vehicle into four persons. The court noted cross-FIRs between the parties, that no one was injured, prolonged custody since late November 2025, charge-sheet filed and trial likely to take time, and granted regular bail to all four on furnishing bonds.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted to all four applicants on personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to appearing before the trial court on fixed dates and when called.

Vikram Singh Gurjar S/O Kishanlal Vs State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:6713]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16752/2025

¶4

Anil Kumar S/o Brijkishor, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dhani Chanduwali Road Tan Bansur, Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Behror, District Kotputli-Behror).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1456/2026 Vinod Kumar Son Of Ratiram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Dhani Chanduwali Road Bansur, Police Station Bansur, District KotputliBehror (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Behror, District Kotputli-Behror).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1457/2026 Vikram Singh Gurjar S/o Kishanlal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Katariya Ka Bas, Police Station Harsora, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Behror, District Kotputli-Behror)

¶16

----Petitioner

¶17

Versus

¶18

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶19

----Respondent

¶20

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2337/2026 Sumit Gurjar S/o Savatram, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Mahanpur, Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Behror District Kotputli-Behror).

¶21

----Petitioner

¶22

Versus

¶23

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-16752/2025]

¶24

[2026:RJ-JP:6713]

¶25

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶26

----Respondent

¶27

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Rajveer Gurjar
		Ms. Saroj Singh
		Mr. Hem Chand
		Mr. Bharat Yadav
		Mr. R.P.Gautam
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Manvendra Singh,PP

¶28

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order

¶29

12/02/2026

¶30

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k vfuy dqekj] fouksn dqekj] foØe flag ,oa lqfer xqtZj dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds varxZr iqfyl Fkkuk ckulwj ftyk dksViwryh&cgjksM+ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 342@2025 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 109¼1½] 324¼4½] 126¼2½] 189¼2½] 61¼2½¼,½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk esa fu;fer tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk vyx&vyx izkFkZuk&i= is'k fd, x, gSa] ftudk fuLrkj.k bl ,d gh vkns'k ls fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶31

cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k vfuy dqekj] fouksn] foØe ,oa lqfer dk rdZ gS fd mUgsa izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd okLrfodrk esa ifjoknh i{k dh vksj ls vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk ?kVuk iwoZ esa dkfjr dh xbZ Fkh ftlds lEcU/k esa vfHk;qDr fouksn us ,d izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 321@2025 ntZ djokbZ FkhA mudk rdZ gS fd Lo;a ifjoknh i{k iwoZ esa Hkh vfHk;qDrx.k ij geyk dj pqdk gS ,oa orZeku ?kVuk esa Hkh mUgha ds }kjk ?kVuk dkfjr dh xbZ Fkh] ftlds lEcU/k esa Hkh mudh vksj ls ØkWl izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 343@2025 izLrqr dh xbZ gSA mDr rFkkdfFkr lEiw.kZ ?kVuk esa fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ migfr dkfjr ugha gqbZ gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vfuy dqekj fnukad 27-11-2025 ls] izkFkhZ lqfer fnukad 30-11-2025 ls ,oa fouksn rFkk foØe fnukad 03-12-2025 ls fujarj vfHkj{kk esa gSA vkjksi&i= is'k gks pqdk gS] vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA fdlh Hkh vfHk;qDr ds fo:)

[2026:RJ-JP:6713]

[CRLMB-16752/2025]

(3 of 3)

iwoZ dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k iathc) ugha gSA vr% mUgsa tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk,A

¶36

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd pkjksa vfHk;qDrx.k dk ?kVuk dkfjr djus okyksa esa uke gSA muds }kjk efgiky] ?ku';ke] v'kksd dqekj ,oa dkyw mQZ Hkhejkt ij okgu p<+kdj mudh e`R;q dkfjr djus dk iz;kl fd;k x;k gSA rFkkdfFkr okgu ftlds }kjk VDdj ekjuk crk, x, gSa muesa ls okgu Fkkj vfHk;qDr vfuy ds vkf/kiR; ls cjken gqbZ gSA xEHkhj vijk/k gS] vr% izkFkhZx.k dh tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= fujLr fd;k tk,A

¶37

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u

¶38

fd;k x;kA

¶39

i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd vfHk;qDr i{k dh vksj ls iwoZ esa ifjoknh i{k ds fo:) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djokbZ xbZ gSA orZeku ekeys dh ?kVuk esa ifjoknh vFkok vfHk;qDr nksuksa i{kksa esa ls fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks fdlh izdkj dh pksV ugha vkbZ gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vfuy dqekj fnukad 27-11-2025 ls] izkFkhZ lqfer fnukad 30-11-2025 ls ,oa fouksn rFkk foØe fnukad 03-12-2025 ls fujarj vfHkj{kk esa gSA vkjksi&i= is'k gks pqdk gS] vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa bu izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶40

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr pkjksa tekur izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd, tkrs gSa vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrk ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks] rks mls bl ekeys esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk;sA

¶41

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶42

AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /15, 16, 17, 19

Vikram Singh Gurjar S/O Kishanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Singh Gurjar S/O Kishanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Puranmal S/O Chheetarmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kiranpal S/O Jagdish Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikas @ Vikka S/O Veerbhan Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhartram S/O Bhopalram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sahayata Bai W/O Parwatlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishanlal S/O Shri Gatiya Vs the State of Rajasthan