The Rajasthan High Court allowed the bail application of Dinesh Kumar, granting the right to legal representation due to the constable and gangster's humiliating conduct during arrest and recovery.
The bail application is allowed, and the petitioner is entitled to be represented by an advocate in the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:4710]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13720/2025
Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Badrilal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Diwaniya, Police Station Budhadheet, District Kota. (At Presently Confined In District Jail Kota).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
02/02/2026
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk cw<knhr] ftyk dksVk xzkeh.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 120@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 318¼4½] 338] 336¼3½] 340¼2½] 61¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk] 2023 esa tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuki= is'k fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd fookfnr tehu jkeyky ds uke ntZ Fkh vkSj mls lgvfHk;qDr gsrjke ds uke djokus esa vkSj gsrjke ds uke ukekarj.k [kqyokus esa izkFkhZ dh dsoy ,d xokg ds :i esa gh Hkwfedk gksuk crk;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr xzkeh.k ifjos'k dk O;fDr gS vkSj mlus gsrjke dh igpku ek= dh FkhA mudk rdZ gS fd gsrjke }kjk tehu dk tks eqvkotk izkIr fd;k x;k gS] mlesa ls fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ jkf'k izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk izkIr ugha dh xbZ gSA mudk rdZ gS fd mDr ekeys esa tks jkf'k izkIr dh xbZ gS]
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-13720/2025]
[2026:RJ-JP:4710]
mlesa ls yxHkx 24]00]000@& #i;s dh jkf'k dh cjkenxh gks pqdh gSA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fo}ku vf/koDrk us fuEu U;kf;d fu.kZ; izLrqr fd;k gS&
1- Jugraj Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Criminal Appeal No. 3640/2025
mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa vc vkjksii= izLrqr gks pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 02-10-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo#) iwoZ dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr ugha gSA izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dk ykHk iznku fd;k tkosA
blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us gh vU; vfHk;qDrx.k o gsrjke ds lkFk feydj vkijkf/kd "kM+;a= djds iVokjh ds le{k bl vk'k; ds >wBs dFku fd, fd gsrjke] jkeyky dk okfjl gS] tcfd mls Hkyh&Hkkfra ls tkudkjh Fkh fd gsrjke] jkeyky dk okfjl ugha gS vkSj bl izdkj ls tehu dk ukekarj.k gsrjke ds uke [kqyok;k vkSj gsrjke us blds cnys esa ljdkj ls yxHkx 32]00]000@& #i;s eqvkotk izkIr fd;k gSA dqN jkf'k cjken Hkh gqbZ gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnus'k ds [kkrs esa Hkh nl yk[k #i;s dh jkf'k tek gqbZ gSA vr% vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo#) /kkjk 318¼4½] 338] 336¼3½] 340¼2½] 61¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk] 2023 ds xEHkhj vijk/kksa dk vfHk;ksx gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj vkijkf/kd "kM+;a= djds vijk/k dkfjr fd;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk ;g tkurs gq, fd gsrjke] jkeyky dk okfjl ugha gS] mlds ckotwn iVokjh ds le{k >wBs dFku fd, gSa vkSj iVokjh ds le{k >wBs dFku dj jkeyky dh tehu dk ukekarj.k gsrjke ds uke djok fn;k gS rFkk gsrjke dks mDr tehu dk ljdkj }kjk tks yxHkx 32]00]000@& #i;s dk eqvkotk feyk gS] mlesa ls Lo;a izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us Hkh nl yk[k #i;s vius [kkrs esa izkIr fd, gS a A vHkh rd izdj.k esa fopkj.k vkjaHk ugha gqvk gSA vr% mi;qZDr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa
[2026:RJ-JP:4710]
[CRLMB-13720/2025]
(3 of 3)
j[krs gq, bl Lrj ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk vLohdkj dj fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
NIMIT GOYAL /48
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be represented by an advocate due to the humiliating manner of arrest and recovery by the constable and gangster.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jugraj Singh Vs. State of PunjabReferred¶18
Jugraj Singh Vs. State of Punjab
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Badrilal
The State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
