Allowed¶20

Sahil Sharma S/O Shri Maheshchand Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Jan 2026CRLMB/137/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan HC Jaipur; S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application 137/2026 (CRLMB-137/2026); decided 23/01/2026 by Pramil Kumar Mathur, J.; bail allowed u/S 483 BNSS; FIR 287/2025 PS Jamdoli, Jaipur City (East); offences u/Ss. 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 307, 109(1) BNS; accused Sahil Sharma s/o Maheshchand Sharma; custody since 04.12.2025; no criminal past; name not in FIR; no specific act/injury attributed; injured: Abhishek Meena, Mukesh Meena; personal bond Rs.50,000/- plus two sureties Rs.25,000/- each; no opinion on merits; no precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner Sahil Sharma on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, with appearance before that Court on all dates till conclusion of the trial. ¶20

Sahil Sharma S/O Shri Maheshchand Sharma Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶20

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner Sahil Sharma, an accused in FIR No. 287/2025 (P.S. Jamdoli, District Jaipur City East) for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 307 and 109(1) of BNS, should be enlarged on bail under Section 483 BNSS.

¶12

Court's answer

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record, and without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, the Court was inclined to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Ratio / Principle

The bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed; the petitioner Sahil Sharma is to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, and to appear before that Court on all dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail granted. High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench (Pramil Kumar Mathur, J., 23.01.2026), allowed a bail application under Section 483 BNSS moved by Sahil Sharma, an accused in custody in FIR No. 287/2025, P.S. Jamdoli, District Jaipur City (East), registered for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 307 and 109(1) of BNS. Counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner's name did not figure in the FIR, that no specific act was attributed to him, that no specific injuries were caused by him to the injured persons Abhishek Meena and Mukesh Meena, and that he had been in custody since 04.12.2025 without any criminal past while the trial would take considerable time. The Public Prosecutor opposed the application. Without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, the Court held it inclined to grant the benefit of bail and directed release on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, with appearance on all dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:3177]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 137/2026

¶4

Sahil Sharma S/o Shri Maheshchand Sharma, R/o Village Surer Goth, Police Station Rajgarh, District Alwar, At Present Tenant Plot No. 18 Bharat Vihar Jamdoli, Luniyawas, Jaipur East, (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus
Public Prosecutor	----Respondent

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Rahul Agrawal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vivek Sharma,PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶10

Order

¶11

23/01/2026

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.287/2025 registered at Police Station Jamdoli, District-Jaipur City (East) for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 307 and 109(1) of BNS.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the name of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR and that no specific act has been attributed to the present petitioner. He also submits that no specific injuries were caused to the injured persons, namely Abhishek Meena and Mukesh Meena by him. Petitioner is behind the bars since 04.12.2025 without any criminal past. The trial of the case may take considerable time,

[2026:RJ-JP:3177]

[CRLMB-137/2026]

(2 of 2)

therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶19

On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner- Sahil Sharma S/o Shri Maheshchand Sharma shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/ each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶22

Arun/109

Sahil Sharma S/O Shri Maheshchand Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahil Sharma S/O Shri Maheshchand Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anupam Goyal S/O Chaturbhuj Goyal Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohit S/O Raju Vs State of Rajasthan

Surji Devi W/O Shivram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shoaib @ Sohib S/O Ismail Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Meena S/O Jodhraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Aashib S/O Farahim Vs State of Rajasthan