Allowed

Rama B. Kodiyatar S/O Bhikhubhai Kodiyar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Sept 2026CRLMB/13277/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court Bench at Jaipur granted bail to two petitioners, Rama B. Kodiyatar and Bhura M Mori, accused of liquor offences. The court allowed the application under Section 483 BNSS, directing their release on personal bond with sureties pending trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to be released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Rama B. Kodiyatar S/O Bhikhubhai Kodiyar Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35655]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13277/2026 CNR: RJHC020818202026 | URN: CRLMB / 24605U / 2026

¶4

Rama B. Kodiyatar S/o Bhikhubhai Kodiyar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ladhadharnes, P.s. Ranawas, District Porbandar-Gujrat. (At Presently Confined In Central Jail, Kota, Dist. Kota).

¶5

Bhura M Mori S/o Maysoor Bhai Mori, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ladhadharnes, P.s. Ranawas, District Porbandar-Gujrat. (At Presently Confined In Central Jail, Kota, Dist. Kota).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Anupam Sharma with
	Mr. Harshit Parashar
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta,PP

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶12

03/09/2026

¶13

The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.144/2026 registered at Police Station Kanwas, District Kota Rural for offences under Section 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioners is that 3,240 bottles of liquor were recovered from their conscious

[2026:RJ-JP:35655]

[CRLMB-13277/2026]

(2 of 2)

possession. The petitioners have been behind bars since 25.07.2026 and have no criminal antecedents. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.

¶21

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners- Rama B. Kodiyatar S/o Bhikhubhai Kodiyar and Bhura M Mori S/o Maysoor Bhai Mori , be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

¶22

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶23

58/Arun

Rama B. Kodiyatar S/O Bhikhubhai Kodiyar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rama B. Kodiyatar S/O Bhikhubhai Kodiyar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases