Amit Siongh S/O Rajendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

Amit Siongh S/O Rajendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether the regular bail application of Amit Singh, filed under Section 483 BNSS in FIR No. 298/2025 (PS Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu), should be granted. +1 more

Court's answer

The bail application moved on behalf of applicant/accused Amit Singh son of Rajendra Singh is rejected/dismissed.

Ratio / Principle

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the gravity of the alleged offence against the applicant/accused, and without commenting on the merits of the case, the Court found it inappropriate to grant the benefit of bail to the applicant at this stage.

Key takeaways

Since the applicant is in custody and testimony of only eight witnesses remains, the learned presiding court is expected to make efforts for expeditious disposal of the case in accordance with law.obiter¶32
As recorded by the Court: 58 cyber-fraud complaints stood registered on the unified portal against the applicant's account; the applicant gave his passbook, ATM and cheque-book to co-accused Hemant and took commission; between 26.03.2024 and 13.11.2024 a total of Rs. 3,19,53,231/- was credited and Rs. 3,19,52,000/- withdrawn from the account (aggregate transactions Rs. 6,39,05,231/-); the account was made available to a SIM-linked cyber gang whose members drew illicit gains through net-banking/UPI; and the applicant, knowing of the money transactions through the account, was receiving commission for operating it.ratio¶29

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail refused — S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13128/2025 (order dated 06/02/2026, Justice Chandra Prakash Shrimali). Amit Singh sought regular bail under S. 483 BNSS in FIR No. 298/2025, PS Surajgarh, Jhunjhunu (Ss. 318(2), 318(4), 61(2), 112(2) BNS; Ss. 66C & 66D, Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008). As recorded by the Court, investigation disclosed 58 cyber-fraud complaints against the applicant's account on the unified portal; the applicant had given his passbook, ATM and cheque-book to co-accused Hemant and took commission; between 26.03.2024 and 13.11.2024 Rs. 3,19,53,231/- was credited and Rs. 3,19,52,000/- withdrawn from the account (aggregate transactions Rs. 6,39,05,231/-); the account was made available to a SIM-linked cyber gang earning illicit gains through net-banking/UPI, the applicant knowing of the transactions and receiving commission for operating the account. Cyber-fraud cases were stated to be increasing daily and testimony of only eight witnesses remained. Considering the facts, circumstances and gravity of the alleged offence, without commenting on the merits, the Court held grant of bail inappropriate and dismissed the application, while expecting the trial court to strive for speedy disposal in accordance with law. Four bail orders cited by defence counsel (Shahrukh Khan; Pramod; Vinod Kumar; Vishnu Sharma) were referred but not individually applied.

[2026:RJ-JP:5605]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13128/2025

Amit Singh S/o Rajendra Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bhavthadi, Police Station Surajgarh District Jhunjhunu. Presently Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu.

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI

Order

06/02/2026

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk lwjtx<+ ftyk >qa>quw esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 298@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 318¼2½] 318¼4½] 61¼2½] 112¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk rFkk 66lh o 66Mh lwpuk izks|ksfxdh ¼la'kks/ku½ vf/kfu;e] 2008 esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk dksbZ vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k x;k gS] ftlds fo#) iwoZ esa dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ ugha gSA ml ij dsoy ek= ;g vkjksi gS fd mlus viuk [kkrk vU; lgvfHk;qDr dks iz;ksx djus ds fy, fn;k vkSj vU; lgvfHk;qDr gseUr }kjk lkbcj vijk/k fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj mls tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkosA

[2026:RJ-JP:5605]

[CRLMB-13128/2025]

(2 of 3)

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fuEu fofu'p; izLrqr fd, gSa%&

1- Shahrukh Khan S/o Shri Dheesu Khan Versus State of Rajasthan through, PP and Ors. connected matter; S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No. 13332/2025, order dated 17.10.2025.

Pramod S/o Hari Ram Versus State of Rajasthan through, PP; S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No. 16590/2025, order dated 02.02.2026.

Vinod Kumar S/o Narayan Lal Versus State of Rajasthan through, PP and Ors. connected matters; S.B. Criminal Mis. Bail Appl. No. 13077/2025, order dated 16.12.2025.

Vishnu Sharma S/o Shri Ramswaroop Sharma Versus State of Rajasthan through, PP; S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No. 9925/2025, order dated 11.11.2025.

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksfir vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkosA

eSaus mHk; i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

orZeku izdj.k esa ?kVuk ds rF;ksa ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds [kkrs ds laca/k esa leUo; iksVZy ij lkbZcj QzkWM dh dqy 58 f'kdk;rsa ntZ gqbZaA vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ;g rF; lkeus vk;k gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr us vius [kkrs dh iklcqd] ,Vh,e o pSd cqd gseUr dks ns nh vkSj og lgvfHk;qDr gseUr ls deh'ku ds :i esa ysrk FkkA vuqla/kku ds nkSjku cSad LVsVesaV ls izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vfer flag }kjk fnukad 26-03-2024 ls fnukad 13-11-2024

[2026:RJ-JP:5605]

[CRLMB-13128/2025]

(3 of 3)

rd mlds [kkrs esa dqy 3]19]53]231@&#i, tek gksuk rFkk [kkrs esa dqy 3]19]52]000@&#i, fudklh fd, x,A mDr [kkrs esa fnukad 26-03-2024 ls fnukad 13-11-2024 dh vof/k ds chp esa 6]39]05]231@&#i, dk ysu nsu gqvkA vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ;g rF; lkeus vk;k gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr us viuk [kkrk lkbcj Bxksa ds laxfBr fxjksg dks miyC/k djok;k vkSj lkbcj fxjksg ds lnL;ksa }kjk usV cSafdax o ;w-ih-vkbZ- ds ek/;e ls vuqfpr ykHk izkIr fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds [kkrs ls iSls dk laO;ogkj gqvk Fkk] bl rF; dh mldks tkudkjh Fkh vkSj og [kkrs ds lapkyu ds laca/k esa deh'ku izkIr dj jgk FkkA izdj.k esa lkbcj laca/kh vijk/k izfrfnu c<+ jgs gSa] bl izdj.k esa dsoy ek= 8 lk{khx.k ds c;ku gksuk crk;k x;k gSA

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksfir vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk bl izØe ij izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vfer flag iq= jktsanz flag dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vfHkj{kk esa gS] dsoy ek= 8 lk{khx.k ds c;ku gksuk crk;k x;k gS] vr% fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ls ;g vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd fof/kuqlkj izdj.k ds 'kh?kz fuLrkj.k dk iz;kl djsA

(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J

Kishan Soni/49