Dismissed

Ramprasad Yadav S/O Gopal Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Sept 2026CRLMB/12910/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court denied bail in a criminal miscellaneous application filed by Ramprasad Yadav charged under Section 405 BNSS. The court held that the investigation agency was not formed within the prescribed time and the investigation was incomplete, making bail untenable.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed; petitioner ordered to remain in custody.

Ramprasad Yadav S/O Gopal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35254]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12910/2026 CNR: RJHC020792302026 | URN: CRLMB / 23776U / 2026

¶4

Ramprasad Yadav S/o Gopal Yadav, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Islampur Colony 22, Durgadas Park, Ward No. 19, Murena, Police Station City Kotwali, District Murena, Madhya Pradesh, At Present Tenant House No. 12/116, Kaveri Path, Mansarowar, Police Station Mansarowar, Jaipur. (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Rajeev Sharma
	Mr.	Mukesh Saini
	Mr.	Avi Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	S.R.Dhakad,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶11

Order

¶12

01/09/2026

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g izkFkZuk&i= /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds varxZr iqfyl Fkkuk ekuljksoj ftyk t;iqj flVh nf{k.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 405@2026 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 111¼2½¼[k½] 111¼3½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk] /kkjk 3@25 vk;q/k vf/kfu;e ,oa /kkjk 3@25¼6½ la'kksf/kr vk;q/k vf/kfu;e 2019 esa tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

cgl lquh xbZA

¶15

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mlds vkf/kiR; ls nks ftank dkjrwl cjken gksuk crk;k x;k gS tks fd dejs esa lkFk jgus okys jktw xqtZj ds crk, x, gSaA lkFk gh dksbZ U;k;ky; dh i=koyh feyh gS] dsoy bl vk/kkj ij mls laxfBr vijk/k esa lafyIr

[2026:RJ-JP:35254]

[CRLMB-12910/2026]

(2 of 2)

gksuk ugha ekuk tk ldrk gSA mudk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds tks Hkh eqdnes gSa os eqjSuk e/; izns'k ds gSa rFkk yMkbZ >xM+s ls lEcfU/kr gSa] laxhu vijk/k dk dksbZ eqdnek ugha gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 06-07-2026 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA vUos"k.k ,oa vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% mls tekur ij eqDr fd;k tk,A

¶20

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ykWjsal@jksfgr xksnkjk xSax ds lnL;ksa ds fy, jSdh djrk Fkk vkSj ryk'kh ij mlds vkf/kiR; ls nks ftUnk dkjrwl ,oa ,slh i=koyh feyh gS] ftlesa fofHkUu izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dh izfr;ka] tekur vkns'k dh izfr] Nk;k izfr vkoaVu i=] lkbV Iyku vkfn nLrkost gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds ikap eqdnes gSa] vHkh vUos"k.k iwjk ugha gqvk gSA vr% tekur dk ykHk ugha fn;k tk,A

¶21

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdkZsa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u

¶22

fd;k x;kA

¶23

i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ij ykWjsal@jksfgr xSax ds lnL;ksa ds fy, jSdh djus dk vfHk;ksx gSA mlds vkf/kiR; ls nks ftUnk dkjrwl ,oa nLrkost cjken gksuk crk;k x;k gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ij laxfBr vijk/k esa 'kkfey gksus dk vfHk;ksx gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds ikap vkijkf/kd eqdnes gSaA vHkh vuqla/kku iw.kZ ugha gqvk gSA vr% izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl Lrj ij izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶24

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur dk ;g izkFkZuk&i= vLohdkj dj fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶25

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶26

78/AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL

Ramprasad Yadav S/O Gopal Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramprasad Yadav S/O Gopal Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases