Allowed

Jagdish S/O Hemraj v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Sept 2026CRLMB/12576/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed by the accused under Section 483 BNSS. The accused, charged with offences under the Bharat Nyaya Sanhita 2023, was released on bail after the complainant accepted a compromise and did not object to the grant.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner Jagdish S/o Hemraj to be released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Jagdish S/O Hemraj Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35445]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12576/2026 CNR: RJHC020769752026 | URN: CRLMB / 23208U / 2026

¶4

Jagdish S/o Hemraj, R/o Hukampura, P/s Kishanganj, District Baran (Raj.) (Accused Presently Confined In District Jail Baran).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Saurabh Jain for
	Mr. Bhim Singh Meena
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP
	Mr. Yatharth Agarwal for
	Mr. Rohit Khandelwal

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶11

Order

¶12

02/09/2026

¶13

The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.107/2026 registered at Police Station Kishanganj, District Baran for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 109(1) of BNS-2023.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that, though there is an allegation against the present petitioner of inflicting a life-threatening injury upon the injuredKamal Meena, it is an admitted position that both parties are related to each other and share a close relationship. He submits

[2026:RJ-JP:35445]

[CRLMB-12576/2026]

(2 of 2)

that both parties have arrived at a compromise, and in support of his contention, he has filed a compromise, which is taken on record. The petitioner is behind bars since 16.06.2026 and has no criminal antecedents. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶20

Learned counsel for the complainant has conceded to the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, admitted the factum of the compromise, and has raised no objection to the grant of bail to the present petitioner. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Jagdish S/o Hemraj, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶22

59/RASHMI

Jagdish S/O Hemraj v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish S/O Hemraj v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases