Allowed

Arvind @ Vijay S/O Shri Jagnath v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Sept 2026CRLMB/12492/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application under Section 483 of BNSS. The petitioner, confined since May 25, 2026, was implicated in theft of ornaments. The Court, observing that a lengthy trial would serve no purpose, granted bail subject to a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each stipulating appearance for all subsequent dates of hearing.

Arvind @ Vijay S/O Shri Jagnath Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35121]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12492/2026 CNR: RJHC020764382026 | URN: CRLMB / 23051U / 2026

¶4

Arvind @ Vijay S/o Shri Jagnath, Aged 23 Years, R/o Kajipur Police Station Sanbharlek District Jaipur Rural (At Present Confined Sub Jail Sanbharlek District Jaipur).

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶11

Order

¶12

01/09/2026

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No. 124/2026 registered at Police Station Jobner, District Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 305(a) and 331(3) of BNS, 2023.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that the petitioner committed theft of ornaments from the shop of the complainantArving @ Vijay. The case is exclusively triable by Magistrate. Petitioner is behind the bars since 25.05.2026 though one other case has been reported against him, however in the said case he is bailed out. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the

[2026:RJ-JP:35121]

[CRLMB-12492/2026]

(2 of 2)

case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶21

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner- Arvind @ Vijay S/o Shri Jagnath , be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

¶23

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶24

65/EKTA

Arvind @ Vijay S/O Shri Jagnath v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind @ Vijay S/O Shri Jagnath v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases