Allowed

Hariom S/O Shri Lajjaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Sept 2026CRLMB/11927/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to Hariom S/o Shri Lajjaram in a case under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS, 2023. The court allowed the application without expressing an opinion on merits, directing release upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court, with stipulation to appear on all subsequent dates of hearin

Hariom S/O Shri Lajjaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35181]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11927/2026 CNR: RJHC020718772026 | URN: CRLMB / 21970U / 2026

¶4

Hariom S/o Shri Lajjaram, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Noni Thana Jagner Hall Narayan Vihar Colony Hundawal Road Dholpur Thana Nihalganj Distt Dholpur (At Present Confined In Central Jail Dholpur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp Raj. High Court Jaipur Bench Jaipur.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Govind Khandelwal with
	Mr.	Mukesh Kumar Saini
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Jaiprakash Tiwari,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶11

Order

¶12

01/09/2026

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No. 0224/2026 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur for offences under Section 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS, 2023.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. The prime allegation allegation to sell a government property which is not situated at the location mentioned in the relevant documents is against main accused Munna Lal. Petitioner is behind the bars since 04.07.2026.

[2026:RJ-JP:35181]

[CRLMB-11927/2026]

(2 of 2)

Charge-sheet has already been filed. The investigation/trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶21

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.

¶22

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner- Hariom S/o Shri Lajjaram , be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

¶23

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶24

183/EKTA SAINI

Hariom S/O Shri Lajjaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hariom S/O Shri Lajjaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases