Allowed

Akash Singh S/O Late Shri Gulab Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Sept 2026CRLMB/11330/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the accused-petitioner's second bail application under Section 483 of BNSS. Considering long custody, lack of antecedents, and the injury declaring himself hostile, the Court enlarged the petitioner on bail without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Release on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each and compliance with bail conditions.

Akash Singh S/O Late Shri Gulab Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35678]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No.

¶4

11330/2026

¶5

CNR: RJHC020678122026 | URN: CRLMB / 20932U / 2026

¶6

Akash Singh S/o Late Shri Gulab Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Naharpura, P.S. Jawaja, District Beawar. (Presently Lodged At District Jail Beawar).

¶7

----Accused-Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, through PP

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya-Ur-Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP

¶12

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶13

Order

¶14

03/09/2026

¶15

The instant second bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 06.10.2025 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 266/2025 registered at Police Station Jawaja, District Beawer, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 333, 115(2), 126(2), 110, 118(1), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of BNS and Sections 4 and 5 of Arms Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He further submits that during trial injured Balwant Singh has been declared hostile as he has said nothing incriminating against the accused-petitioner and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so

[2026:RJ-JP:35678]

[CRLMB-11330/2026]

(2 of 3)

no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accusedpetitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accusedpetitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶21

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accusedpetitioner hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner.

¶22

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; that during trial injured Balwant Singh has been declared hostile and said nothing incriminating against accused-petitioner; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accusedpetitioner on bail.

¶23

Therefore, the instant second bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Akash Singh S/o Late Shri Gulab Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

[2026:RJ-JP:35678]

[CRLMB-11330/2026]

(3 of 3)

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in a month in the concerned police station.

¶28

In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶29

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶30

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities and SHO through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶31

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶32

22/HEENA

Akash Singh S/O Late Shri Gulab Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akash Singh S/O Late Shri Gulab Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases