Allowed

Istak Khan S/O Ismail Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Sept 2026CRLMB/11108/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sangeeta Sharma allowed the second bail application filed by Istak Khan in connection with offences under provisions of BNS and IT Act. The court observed that the charge-sheet was filed, the petitioner remained in custody since May 22, 2026, and no criminal antecedents existed. The petition was allowed without expressing opinion on merits, directing release on bond with condi

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioner Istak Khan ordered to be released on bail by furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

Istak Khan S/O Ismail Khan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35662]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No.

¶4

11108/2026

¶5

CNR: RJHC020661742026 | URN: CRLMB / 20529U / 2026

¶6

Istak Khan S/o Ismail Khan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Meenaka Baas, Police Station Barodameo, District Alwar, Rajasthan (At Present Confined In Alwar Jail)

¶7

----Accused-Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, through PP

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sabir Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP

¶12

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶13

Order

¶14

03/09/2026

¶15

The instant second bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 10.06.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 155/2026 registered at Police Station Baroda Meo, District Alwar, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and,

[2026:RJ-JP:35662]

[CRLMB-11108/2026]

(2 of 3)

therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶21

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accusedpetitioner hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner.

¶22

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 22.05.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accusedpetitioner on bail.

¶23

Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Istak Khan S/o Ismail Khan is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶24

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.

¶25

The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with mobile number to the concerned SHO/IO

[2026:RJ-JP:35662]

[CRLMB-11108/2026]

(3 of 3)

within three days of release and the concerned SHO/IO shall verify the said mobile number and his address. In case, the accusedpetitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO/IO and also before the concerned learned Trial Court. The accused-petitioner is further directed to submit to the concerned SHO/IO, a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in his possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within three days of release under this bail order.

¶30

In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶31

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶32

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities and S.H.O. through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶33

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶34

21/HEENA

Istak Khan S/O Ismail Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Istak Khan S/O Ismail Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases