Allowed

Akshya Kumar Meena S/O Late Shri Hanuman Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Sept 2026CRLMB/10947/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, allowed the second bail application of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS. The court deems it just and proper to release the accused on bail without expressing an opinion on the merits, subject to furnishing a personal bond and two sureties along with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioner Akshya Kumar Meena ordered to be released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Akshya Kumar Meena S/O Late Shri Hanuman Meena Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35657]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No.

¶4

10947/2026

¶5

CNR: RJHC020650402026 | URN: CRLMB / 20272U / 2026

¶6

Akshya Kumar Meena S/o Late Shri Hanuman Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Uliyana, Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur, Presently Tenant In Flat No. 408, A- Block Ghar Angan Society Police Station Muhana, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶7

----Accused-Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, through PP

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Kailash Chand Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP

¶12

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order

¶13

03/09/2026

¶14

The instant second bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 22.05.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 300/2026 registered at Police Station Shipra Path, Jaipur City(South) for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS.

¶15

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He submits that accused-petitioner has been acquitted in four cases out of nine cases pending against him. He submits that the no amount has been deposited in the bank account of the accused-petitioner

[2026:RJ-JP:35657]

[CRLMB-10947/2026]

(2 of 3)

in relation to cyber fraud. Nor any person has been examined during the course of investigation against whom offence of cheating has been committed by the accused-petitioner; that no criminal case of similar nature has ever been registered against the accused-petitioner and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶20

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accusedpetitioner hereinabove and submits that there are nine criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 09.05.2026 and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶21

Therefore, the instant second bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Akshya Kumar Meena S/o Late Shri Hanuman Meena is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to

[2026:RJ-JP:35657]

[CRLMB-10947/2026]

(3 of 3)

which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶26

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with mobile number to the concerned SHO/IO within three days of release and the concerned SHO/IO shall verify the said mobile number and his address. In case, the accusedpetitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO/IO and also before the concerned learned Trial Court. The accused-petitioner is further directed to submit to the concerned SHO/IO, a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in his possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within three days of release under this bail order.

¶27

In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶28

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶29

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities and S.H.O. through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶30

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶31

19/HEENA

Akshya Kumar Meena S/O Late Shri Hanuman Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akshya Kumar Meena S/O Late Shri Hanuman Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases