Allowed

Sharif S/O Kamru v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Sept 2026CRLMB/10813/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed three connected bail applications filed by Liyakat Ali, Sharif, and Mazid. Considering no criminal antecedents, no recovery needed, and long trial duration, the Court granted bail subject to personal bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail upon execution of a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Sharif S/O Kamru Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35205]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10334/2026 CNR: RJHC020618862026 | URN: CRLMB / 19146U / 2026

¶4

Liyakat Ali S/o Ali Mohammad, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Nimla, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg District Deeg).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10813/2026 CNR: RJHC020629032026 | URN: CRLMB / 20018U / 2026

¶11

Sharif S/o Kamru, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Dharmshala, Police Station Kaithawada, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10970/2026 CNR: RJHC020646802026 | URN: CRLMB / 20308U / 2026 Mazid S/o Fayyaj, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Dharmshala, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg).

¶17

----Petitioner

¶18

Versus

¶19

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶20

----Respondent

¶21

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Rajveer Singh
	Mr.	Ankit Khandelwal
	Mr.	Arafat Hussain
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Sudesh Saini, P.P.

(2 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:35205]

[CRLMB-10334/2026]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA

¶26

Order

¶27

01/09/2026

¶28

These criminal misc. bail applications have been filed by the petitioners Liyakat Ali S/o Ali Mohammad, Sharif S/o Kamru & Mazid S/o Fayyaj, under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023, who were arrested by the Police in connection with the FIR bearing No.102/2026 dated 18.06.2026 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 112(2), 303(2) & 317(2) of B.N.S., 2023.

¶29

Learned counsel submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present cases and they have no criminal antecedents of any nature in the past, however, the accusedpetitioner - Mazid S/o Fayyaj has two criminal cases including the present one and he has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court in the other case and no recovery is required to be made from him. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the accused-petitioners be enlarged on bail, as the trial will take sufficiently long time.

¶30

Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application, however, could not refute the contention by submitting that there are no criminal antecedents of any nature in the past against the accused-petitioners Liyakat Ali & Sharif. As far as the accused-petitioner Mazid S/o Fayyaj is concerned, he has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court in one of the pending cases.

¶31

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the contents of the FIR.

[2026:RJ-JP:35205]

[CRLMB-10334/2026]

(3 of 3)

This Court, after considering the above facts as pointed out by the learned Public Prosecutor, nature of allegation and noticing the fact that no recovery is required to be made, accusedpetitioners have no criminal antecedents, trial will take sufficiently long time, and without commenting upon merits of the case, is inclined to exercise its powers under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

¶36

Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners Liyakat Ali S/o Ali Mohammad, Sharif S/o Kamru & Mazid

¶37

S/o Fayyaj, shall be released on bail, provided each of them execute a personal bond in a sum of ₹1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of ₹50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail applications will not affect the trial of the cases.

¶38

It is further directed that in case, the petitioners are found to be involved in any case within two years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bails.

¶39

(RAVI CHIRANIA),J

¶40

60-62/Monika

Sharif S/O Kamru v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharif S/O Kamru v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases