Salman Khan S/O Taiyab Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

The instant second bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 37/2026 registered at Police Station Jaluki, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act.

¶15

Brother of petitioner present in person submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has been filed. He also submits that the accusedpetitioner is in custody since long. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore,

¶16

[2026:RJ-JP:24946]

¶17

[CRLMB-10091/2026]

¶18

(2 of 3)

¶19

prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶20

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by brother of petitioner hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner.

¶21

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 19.03.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶22

Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Salman Khan S/o Taiyab Khan is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.

¶24

In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application

[2026:RJ-JP:24946]

[CRLMB-10091/2026]

(3 of 3)

against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶29

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶30

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶31

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶32

44/HEENA

Salman Khan S/O Taiyab Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salman Khan S/O Taiyab Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjeet S/O Maherchand Vs the State of Rajasthan

Teekam Singh Prajapat S/O Sh. Suwalal Prajapat Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sandeep @ Raja S/O Ajaypal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddam Khan S/O Fumman Khan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Manish S/O Ramdhan Vs State of Rajasthan

Irfan S/O Sh. Mohmmad Haneef Vs State of Rajasthan