Application to recall an order dismissing a criminal misc. petition in default due to counsel's absence caused by the matter not being marked in the cause list. The court allowed the application and restored the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 268/2026 URN: CRLMA / 688U / 2026
In
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.653/2016
----Petitioners
Versus
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
KuldeepSharma |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Manvendra Singh Shekhawat,PP |
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
08/07/2026
[CRLMA-268/2026]
(2 of 2)
the said bona fide mistake, he could not appear and argue the matter and absence of the counsel, the case was dismissed in default. Counsel submits that important question of law and facts are involved in the petition, which are required to be adjudicated on merits by this Court, hence, the aforesaid order be recalled.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
KuD/61
Ramji Lal
Nanag Ram Meena
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
Jitendra Singh Shekhawat
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
