The High Court Bench at Jaipur dismissed an application seeking cancellation of the suspension of sentence. It observed the accused-applicant was absent for previous hearings and no case existed for revocation.
Application seeking cancellation of the suspension of sentence stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:25179-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension of Sentence
(Cancellation) Application No. 103/2025
In
D.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension of Sentence Application No.1651/2024
In
D.B. Criminal Appeal No.307/2024 URN: CRLMA / 241U / 2025
Pankaj S/o Lakhan Singh, Nadora Rajakheda Dholpur (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Addl.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order
06/07/2026
None present on behalf of the accused-applicant.
No one has appeared on behalf of the accused-applicant to argue the matter for last two occasions.
Upon consideration of the record, in our view, no case is made out for cancellation of the suspension of sentence granted by this Court vide order dated 04.12.2024.
Accordingly, the present application seeking cancellation of the suspension of sentence stands dismissed.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra Pratap Singh/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present application seeking cancellation of the suspension of sentence deserves to be allowed.
Pankaj S/o Lakhan Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Inderjeet Singh
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
