Amba Lal Meena S/O Shri Morpal Meena Vs Smt. Kanchan Meena @ Kali W/O Dr. Ramphool Meena — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Amba Lal Meena S/O Shri Morpal Meena Vs Smt. Kanchan Meena @ Kali W/O Dr. Ramphool Meena — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

None. The civil revision petition is dismissed on the ground of non-entertainability ('xzkg~;rk' / grahyata as decoded), and pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are dismissed accordingly.

Issue for consideration

Whether the grounds taken in the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC — the alleged typing errors in the testimony affidavit of witness Kanchan Meena (incorrect summation of the claim amount at items 7 and 8, and corrections made by inserting zeros in the actual amounts recorded at items 2 and 7 without initialling) — fall within the ambit of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC so as to justify rejection of the plaint, and whether the trial court's order dated 25-09-2025 dismissing that application was illegal or irregular.

Court's answer

The grounds raised in the Order 7 Rule 11 CPC application — the incorrect summation of the claim amount at items 7 and 8 of witness Kanchan Meena's testimony affidavit, and the absence of short signatures/initials on corrections effected by inserting zeros in the actual amounts recorded at items 2 and 7 — do not fall within the ambit of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, and on such grounds no suit can be rejected.

Ratio / Principle

In this Court's opinion, the order dated 25-09-2025 passed by the trial court contains no illegality, contravention of law, error or irregularity of any kind.

Key takeaways

Accordingly, the civil revision petition is not fit to be entertained.ratio¶20

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 340/2025, High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench (Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Shubha Mehta), decided 09/01/2026. The revision petition challenged the trial court's order dated 25-09-2025, by which an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint was dismissed. That application rested on alleged typing errors in the testimony affidavit of witness Kanchan Meena — an incorrect summation of the claim amount at items 7 and 8 of the affidavit, and corrections carried out by inserting zeros in the actual amounts recorded at items 2 and 7 without initialling. HELD: such grounds do not fall within the ambit of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and no suit can be rejected on their basis; the trial court's order discloses no illegality, contravention of law, error or irregularity. The civil revision petition is dismissed as not fit to be entertained, and pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand dismissed. On the face of the order, the petitioner appears to have been the defendant in the suit below and the respondent the plaintiff on whose side the witness was examined; the body of the order is in Hindi rendered in a legacy (non-Unicode) font.

[2026:RJ-JP:866]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 340/2025

Amba Lal Meena S/o Shri Morpal Meena, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Gudla Chandan, Tehsil Bounli, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

Smt. Kanchan Meena @ Kali W/o Dr. Ramphool Meena, Aged About 69 Years, R/o Gudla Chandan, Tehsil Bounli, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.).

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

Order

09/01/2026

fuxjkuhdkj@izfroknh dh vksj ls ;g flfoy fuxjkuh fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukafdr 25-09-2025 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gS] ftlds }kjk mldh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuki= vUrxZr vkns'k 07 fu;e 11 lhihlh fujLr fd;k x;k gSA

izfroknh dh vksj ls izkFkZuki= vUrxZRk vkns'k 07 fu;e 11 lhihlh esa ewy okn dks vLohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ;g dgrs gq, dh xbZ gS fd oknh dh vksj ls lk{kh dapu eh.kk ds izLrqr lk{; 'kiFki= esa Vad.k dh =qfV dh xbZ gSA 'kiFki= dh en la[;k 7 o 8 esa tks Dyse jkf'k vafdr dh xbZ gS] mldk ;ksx xyr yxk;k x;k gS rFkk 'kiFki= dh en la[;k 2 o 7 esa of.kZr vly jkf'k esa 'kwU; yxkdj tks lq/kkj ¼correction½ fd;s x;s gSa] mu ij y?kq gLrk{kj Hkh ugha fd;s x;s gS] vkfn-------A

fuxjkuhdkj ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us mlds izkFkZuki= dks rFkk blesa fy;s x;s vk/kkjksa dks vkns'k 07 fu;e 11

(2 of 2) [CR-340/2025]

[2026:RJ-JP:866]

lhihlh dh ifjf/k esa ugha ekurs gq, izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;k gS] tks vkns'k fof/k fo:)] vuqfpr gSA vr% fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkdj oknh dk okn fujLr fd;k tkosA

lquk x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA

izfroknh dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuki= esa tks vk/kkj] lk{kh dapu eh.kk ds izLrqr lk{; 'kiFki= dh en la[;k 7 o 8 esa Dyse jkf'k dk xyr ;ksx yxk;s tkus rFkk 'kiFki= dh en la[;k 2 o 7 esa of.kZr vly jkf'k esa 'kwU; yxkdj fd;s x;s lq/kkjksa ¼corrections½ ij y?kq gLrk{kj ugha fd;s tkus laca/kh] mBk;s x;s gSa] os vkns'k 07 fu;e 11 lhihlh dh ifjf/k esa ugha vkrs gSa vkSj muds vk/kkj ij dksbZ Hkh okn vLohdkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 25-09-2025 esa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ voS/krk] fof/k fo:)rk] =qfV ;k vfu;ferrk ugha gSA vr% fuxjkuh xzkg~; fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA

ifj.kker% ;g flfoy fuxjkuh xzkg~;rk ds izdze ij fujLr dh tkrh gSA rn~uqlkj fofo/k izkFkZuki=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] rks fujLr fd;s tkrs gSaA

VISHAL SHARMA /04