Dismissed¶30

Anil Kumar S/O Umrao, v. Nityanand S/O Sheoram

Rajasthan HC9 Mar 2026CFA/1194/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 1194/2025; Anil Kumar v. Nityanand and Krishan Kumar; compromise deed dated 17.12.2025; Lok Adalat settlement during pendency; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; refund of court fees Rs.1,05,160/-; reliance on High Court of Judicature at Madras Vs. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors., (2021) 3 SCC 560; Justice Maneesh Sharma; order dated 09/03/2026.

What did the court decide?

First appeal dismissed as withdrawn; appellant granted refund of court fees of Rs.1,05,160/- with direction to the Registry to prepare a refund certificate; compromise deed dated 17.12.2025 taken on record. ¶30

Anil Kumar S/O Umrao, Vs Nityanand S/O Sheoram — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶30

Issue for consideration

Whether the application (I.A. No.1/2026) seeking to take the compromise deed dated 17.12.2025 on record should be allowed. +1 more

¶13

Court's answer

The application (I.A. No.1/2026) is allowed and the compromise deed dated 17.12.2025 arrived at between the parties is taken on record.

¶16

Ratio / Principle

In view of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the compromise deed dated 17.12.2025 arrived at in the spirit of Lok Adalat, the present civil first appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶25

Key takeaways

The appellant is entitled to refund of the court fees of Rs.1,05,160/- in terms of the Apex Court judgment in High Court of Judicature at Madras Vs. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors.; the Registry is directed to prepare a certificate regarding the refund of the court fees in favour of the appellant.ratio¶29
The stay application and the other pending applications, if any, including I.A. No.1/2026, stand disposed of.ratio¶31

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 1194/2025, High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur (Maneesh Sharma, J.), order dated 09/03/2026. Application I.A. No.1/2026 was allowed and the compromise deed dated 17.12.2025, executed between appellant Anil Kumar and respondents Nityanand and Krishan Kumar during the pendency of the appeal in the spirit of Lok Adalat, was taken on record. On the appellant's unopposed prayer, the first appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in view of the settlement. The appellant was held entitled to refund of the court fees of Rs.1,05,160/- in terms of the Apex Court judgment in High Court of Judicature at Madras Vs. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors., (2021) 3 SCC 560, and the Registry was directed to prepare a refund certificate in his favour. The stay application and other pending applications, including I.A. No.1/2026, stand disposed of.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 1194/2025

¶3

Anil Kumar S/o Umrao, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Village Tapukda, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.).

¶4

----Appellant

¶5

Versus

¶6

Nityanand S/o Sheoram, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Khanpur, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar.

¶7

Krishan Kumar S/o Devi Sahai, Resident Of House No. 564, Sector-10-A, Gurgaon, Haryana.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Appellant(s)	: Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma with Mr. Manan Sharma
	Mr. Anil Kumar (Appellant present in person)
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Anil Kumar Jain with Mr. Gaurav Choudhary Mr. Nityanand (Respondent No.1 present in person) Mr. Krishan Kumar (Respondent No.2 present in person)

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order

¶11

09/03/2026

¶12

In Application (I.A. No. 1/2026):

¶13

Matter has come up on an application (I.A. No.1/2026) filed by the appellant for taking the compromise deed dated 17.12.2025 on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection in taking the said compromise on record.

¶15

Heard.

¶16

For the reasons mentioned in the application (I.A. No.1/2026), the same is allowed, the compromise deed dated 17.12.2025, arrived at between the parties is taken on record.

¶17

[CFA-1194/2025]

¶18

(2 of 3)

¶19

In S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 1194/2025:

¶20

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that during the pendency of the present first appeal, the parties herein have settled their disputes amicably in the pious spirit of Lok Adalat vide the said compromise deed dated 17.12.2025.

¶21

He accordingly submits that in view of the compromise deed dated 17.12.2025, the appellant does not to wish to pursue the present first appeal, he therefore seeks permission to withdraw the same. He further prays that the court fees so paid by the appellant in the present appeal may kindly be refunded to the appellant.

¶22

The aforesaid request of the learned counsel for the appellant has not been opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent.

¶23

Lastly, learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the parties to the present first appeal are also present in person before this Court to reaffirm the factum of compromise and accordingly pray for their presence to be marked in the order sheet.

¶24

Heard.

¶25

In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties as well as in view of the compromise deed dated 17.12.2025, arrived at between the parties with the pious spirit of Lok-Adalat , the present civil first appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The court fees so paid by the appellant shall be refunded to the appellant.

¶26

The appellant is entitled for the refund of the Court fees Rs.1,05,160/- in terms of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble

¶27

[CFA-1194/2025]

¶28

(3 of 3)

¶29

Apex Court in the matter of High Court of Judicature at Madras Vs. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors.¹ , therefore, the Registry is directed to prepare a certificate regarding the refund of the Court fees of Rs.1,05,160/- in favour of the appellant.

¶30

In view of the aforesaid discussion, the present civil first appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶31

The stay application and the other pending applications, if any, including IA No.1/2026, stand disposed of.

¶32

(MANEESH SHARMA),J

¶33

EKTA /144

¶34

1 (2021) 3 SCC 560

Anil Kumar S/O Umrao, v. Nityanand S/O Sheoram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar S/O Umrao, v. Nityanand S/O Sheoram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Chand Sharma S/O Shri Ram Chandra Sharma Vs Om Prakash Sharma S/O Shri Chiranji Lal Sharma

Kanhiya Lal S/O Late Shri Prem Chand Vs Chatara @ Chaturbhuj S/O Late Shri Nenga

Pankaj Sarfaraj Solomon, Son of Late Shree Jayant George, Vs Madhulika Mani, Daughter of Late Shree S.J. Solomon, Wife of Late Shree Vineet S. Mani

Murari Lal Madan Vs Jr Engineer Irrigation Deptt and Others

Jr Engineer Irrigation Deptt Vs Smt Vimla Devi

Babu Lal Vs Omprakash and Ors.