In a contempt petition alleging disobedience of a stay order, the petitioner cancelled the petition, citing that the underlying dealership tenure had expired, rendering the petition infructuous.
Contempt petition dismissed as not pressed; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:35241]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 985/2019
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9467/2019
CNR: RJHC020570212019 | URN: CCP / 1009U / 2019
M/s Ghanshyam Dass Shyam Sunder, Through Its Partner Ghanshyam Das S/o Late Shri Ramavtar Agarwal Aged About 69 Years, R/o Having Registered Officeat Jaipur Delhi Road,(Nh-8) Behror, District Alwar (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Akshay Dutt Sharma for |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. | SandeepSingh Shekhawat | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Jai Prakash Gupta |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
01/09/2026
(2 of 2) [CCP-985/2019]
[2026:RJ-JP:35241]
counsel for petitioner does not want to press this contempt petition.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
RONAK JAIMAN/53
M/s Ghanshyam Dass Shyam Sunder
Shri Surjeet Mahalik
Shri Kumar Nandan Singh
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
