Chinku Alias Chintu Alias Rahul S/O Ramgopal Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:11082]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1700/2026

Chinku Alias Chintu Alias Rahul S/o Ramgopal, R/o Gadarwada Nurji Police Station Sarola Jhalawar At Present Loti School Ke Pass Housing Board Colony Jhalawar Police Station Kotwali District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota (Raj.)

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

16/03/2026

¶13

This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accusedpetitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 358/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithoon, District Kota Rural for the offence(s) under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 324(4), 110, 117(2), 191(2) and 190 of BNS, 2023.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 02.12.2025. He further submits that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed. He further submits that the name of the present petitioner does not appear in the FIR, and the other coaccused namely Ajay, whose name is in the FIR, has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order

[2026:RJ-JP:11082]

[CRLMB-1700/2026]

(2 of 3)

dated 19.01.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2^nd Bail Application No. 211/2026. He further submits that the petitioner is on bail in other criminal matters instituted against him and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶19

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 02.12.2025 and the charge-sheet has already been filed. Co-accused whose name is in the FIR has already been enlarged on bail and the name of the present petitioner does not appear in the FIR and the injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life. Trial will take its own time. Without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accusedpetitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Chinku Alias Chintu Alias Rahul S/o Ramgopal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:11082]

[CRLMB-1700/2026]

transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶25

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1^st and 15^th day of every month in the concerned police station.

¶26

In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner(s) for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶27

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶28

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶29

KAVISH /65

Chinku Alias Chintu Alias Rahul S/O Ramgopal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chinku Alias Chintu Alias Rahul S/O Ramgopal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saksham Khandelwal S/O Rajendra Khandelwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunny Babri S/O Veersingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Amol Chopra S/O Shri Pravesh Chopra Vs the State of Rajasthan

Bobby Singh S/O Shri Munna Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shobhag Urf Palit S/O Ramswaroop S/O Kailash Vs State of Rajasthan

Kulveer Mor S/O Baljeet Mor Vs State of Rajasthan