Disposed

M/S. Ummed Engineering and Construction v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Dec 2025WRES/738/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A restoration application seeking reinstatement of a special appeal (writ) that had been listed for restoration; the court allowed the application, restored the appeal, waived registry defects, and listed it for admission.

What did the court decide?

Restoration application allowed; appeal restored to its original number; registry defects waived; listed for admission with interim orders to continue.

M/S. Ummed Engineering and Construction Vs the… — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:51611-DB]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

D.B. Civil Misc. Restoration Application No. 738/2025

¶4

¶5

D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.1211/2025

¶6

M/s. Ummed Engineering And Construction, Through Proprietor Shri Ummed Singh Sikarwar S/o. Shri Surendra Singh, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of A-16, Pushti Vatika, G.i.d.c. Railway Crossing Manjalpur, Vadodara (Gujrat) - 391240

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶10

Chief Engineer Cum Additional Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bhawani Singh Road, C-Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur - 302005.

¶11

Additional Chief Engineer, Water Resources Zone, Sinchai Workshop, Near Collectorate Campus, Bharatpur.

¶12

M/s. Hari Swaroop Sharma, Through Proprietor Hari Swaroop Sharma S/o Patiram Sharma, 110-A, Gali No. 3, Tilak Nagar, Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Madhav Mitra, Sr. Advocate
	assisted by Ms. Jaya Mitra &
	Mr. Shahrukh Khan
	Mr. Veerendra Singh
For Respondent(s)	:

¶15

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order

¶16

19/12/2025

¶17

Heard on application for restoration of the appeal.

¶18

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The appeal is restored to its original number.

¶19

D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.1211/2025:

¶20

It is also pointed out that the appellant has not been able to

¶21

[2025:RJ-JP:51611-DB]

¶22

[WRES-738/2025]

¶23

(2 of 2)

¶24

remove the defects as the affidavit stated to have been filed before the learned Single Judge after the judgment was reserved and copy thereto was not made available. He, therefore, cannot place the same on record.

¶25

The defect pointed out by the Registry is, accordingly, waived.

¶26

List for admission. Interim order, if any, to continue.

¶27

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ

¶28

SANJAY KUMAWAT/RAHUL/40

M/S. Ummed Engineering and Construction v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Ummed Engineering and Construction v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kala S/O Sh. Mahendra Prakash Kala Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Manoj Kala S/O Sh. Mahendra Prakash Kala Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Manoj Kala S/O Sh. Mahendra Prakash Kala Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Jaipur National University Vs State of Rajasthan

Nims University Vs State of Rajasthan

Raman Khandelawal Son of Shri Anil Natani Vs State of Rajasthan