Miscellaneous application seeking correction of an advocate's name in an earlier order; the court directed that the order be read as recording Ms. Shruti Pareek as appearing for the respondents and allowed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:27885]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 299/2025
Sukhdeo Prajapat S/o Late Shri Kamal Prajapat, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Dilwara, Tehsil Nasirabad, Distt. Ajmer.
----Non-applicant
Versus
----Applicants
For Non-applicant(s) : Mr. Veyankatesh Garg For Applicant(s) : Ms. Shruti Pareek
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
25/07/2025
The present application is filed for substitution of name of the Advocate.
Learned counsel for the applicant- Ms. Shruti Pareek has submitted that her name be replaced with Mr. Ajay Shukla in the order dated 12.03.2025, as she was present on last date of hearing.
Considering the submissions made by the applicant, order dated 12.03.2025 be hereby read as “Ms. Shruti Pareek appearing on behalf of respondents.”
Accordingly, the present application is allowed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
DEEPAK/14
Sukhdeo Prajapat
Commanding Officer, 344 Coy, ASC (Sup) Type-B, Pin 905344, C/o 56 APO
Directorate General of Sup and Tpt, QMGs Branch, IHQ MOD (Army) DHQ, PO New Delhi-110011
Major General, Head Quarter Southern Command (S.T.) Pune
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
