Applicant convicted under Section 392/34 IPC sought suspension of sentence during pendency of revision petition. Noting his custody since 19.02.2024 and that the co-accused's sentence was already suspended by a coordinate bench, the court suspended the sentence subject to furnishing a personal bond and sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:5663]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Application for Suspension of Sentence
No.589/2024
In
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1851/2024
Pawan S/o Pannalal, R/o Harijan Basti Rangbadi, Kota, Presently Khatik Mohalla, Kotdi, Kota (Rajasthan). (Presently Confined In Central Jail Kota)
----Applicant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Rajesh Gadwal, Adv. with Mr. Waseem Akram, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
10/02/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:5663]
[CRLR-1851/2024]
(2 of 3)
applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 392/34 of IPC and was sentenced for three years simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs.3,000/-.
[2025:RJ-JP:5663]
[CRLR-1851/2024]
(3 of 3)
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
AARZOO ARORA /09
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the sentence of the applicant should be suspended during pendency of revision given parity with co-accused whose sentence was suspended.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pawan S/o Pannalal
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
