Allowed

Shahid Khan Son of Fatu Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Jul 2025SOSR/217/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Convicted applicants sought suspension of sentence pending their criminal revision. Without commenting on merits, the court allowed suspension of sentence and ordered release on bail on furnishing personal bonds with sureties, subject to appearing before the court when called upon.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended during pendency of petition; applicants to be released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 each with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.

Shahid Khan Son of Fatu Khan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:23969]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.217/2025

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.985/2025

¶6

Shahid Khan Son of Fatu Khan, Resident of Kharkhada Police Station Tijara District Alwar (At Present In Central Jail Alwar)

¶7

Samshu Son of Mahajan, Resident of Kharkhada Police Station Tijara District Alwar (At Present In Central Jail Alwar)

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶11

----Respondent

¶12

For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)

¶13

: Mr. Harendra Singh, Adv. : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P.

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶15

01/07/2025

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶17

Learned counsel for accused-applicants submits that there is no reliable and legally acceptable evidence to hold accusedapplicants guilty for the alleged offence(s) and there is every likelihood of succeeding in the criminal revision. Learned counsel further submits that accused-applicants were on bail during trial as well as during pendency of appeal and presently they are behind bars. Learned counsel further submits that final hearing of the revision is likely to take time thus sentence of accusedapplicants may be suspended.

¶18

(2 of 2) [SOSR-217/2025 in CRLR-985/2025]

¶19

[2025:RJ-JP:23969]

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶21

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶22

Without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case and considering the arguments advanced by the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to applicants.

¶23

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court and affirmed/modified by the learned appellate Court against accused-applicants namely, 1.Shahid Khan S/o

¶24

Fatu Khan & 2.Samshu S/o Mahajan in Criminal Case No.23/126/2015 shall remain suspended during pendency of the petition and they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before this Court on 04^th August, 2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶25

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶26

DANISH USMANI /21

Shahid Khan Son of Fatu Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahid Khan Son of Fatu Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parshuram S/O Shri Dhanna Vs Gram Panchayat Khanpura

Naveen Goyal S/O Late Agrasen Goal Vs State of Rajasthan

Naveen Goyal S/O Late Agrasen Goal Vs State of Rajashtan

Nemicahnd Saini Son of Shri Suresh Chand Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohd Akhtar S/O Mohd. Iliyas Vs Mohd Sajid Kesri S/O Raja Hussaini

Laxman Singh @ Laksha Son of Dalip Singh Vs State of Rajasthan