Applicant sought suspension of sentence in a criminal revision petition; counsel submitted the petitioner had already served the full sentence awarded, rendering the application infructuous, and it was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.165/2024
In
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 488/2024
Birdhichand S/o Shri Poonamchand @ Poonaram, Utshav Vatika Ke Pas Beawar, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Beawar).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav with Mr. Rakesh Trivedi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Dy.GA/PP Mr. Rahul Patni for Mr. Saurabh Bhandari
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order
06/10/2025
Counsel for the applicant submits that during pendency of the instant application, the petitioner has already served his total sentence awarded to him by the Court below, hence, under the changed circumstances, this suspension of sentence application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant suspension of sentence application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
KuD/63
Birdhichand S/o Shri Poonamchand @ Poonaram
State Of Rajasthan
Tejumal Devani S/o Shri Thakur Das
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
