Allowed

Narayan Singh S/O Kishansingh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 May 2025SOSR/145/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan suspended the sentence awarded to the petitioner and ordered his release on bail with a personal bond and two sureties during the pendency of the criminal revision petition, without commenting on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended during pendency of petition; releasable on bail with bond of Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.

Narayan Singh S/O Kishansingh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.

¶3

145/2025

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 694/2025

¶6

Narayan Singh S/o Kishansingh, R/o Nagla Hathi Police Station Chiksana District Bharatpur (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur)

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Sunil Kumar Swami,Adv.
For Respondent(s)	: Ms. Manju Dave,P.P.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Judgment / Order

¶14

06/05/2025

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶16

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that there is no reliable and legally acceptable evidence to hold the accused-applicant guilty for the alleged offence(s) and there is every likelihood of succeeding in the criminal revision. Learned counsel further submits that accused-applicant was on bail during trial as well as appeal and presently he is behind bars. Learned counsel further submits that final hearing of the revision is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶17

(2 of 2) [SOSR 145/2025 in CRLR-694/2025]

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶19

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶20

Without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case and considering the arguments advanced by the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant.

¶21

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court and affirmed by the learned appellate Court against the accused-applicant namely, Narayan Singh S/o Kishansingh in Criminal Case No.1288/2017 shall remain suspended during pendency of the petition and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 09.06.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

YOGESH KUMAR /24

Narayan Singh S/O Kishansingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narayan Singh S/O Kishansingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranveer Singh Lamba Son of Shri Dhan Singh Lamba Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Kumar S/O Ghisaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Kumar Bhargav Son of Shri Prabhu Dayal Vs State of Rajasthan

Aarrif Rehman S/O Shamsur Rehman Vs the State of Rajasthan

Birdaram S/O Dungaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhaniram @ Mango S/O Ramprasad Vs State of Rajasthan