Allowed

Devbai Wife of Harlal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Jan 2025SOSA/45/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan suspended a High Court Criminal Appeal regarding the suspension of a sentence due to insufficient liberal bonds for trial. The Appellants now suspend the antecedent order, directing restoration of the suspension pending trial.

What did the court decide?

Prevailing order relating to suspension of sentence was allowed with a direction to restore the suspension of the pronouncement of punishment and extension in the High Court List pending the trial.

Devbai Wife of Harlal Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:1467]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 45/2025

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 47/2025

¶6

Devbai Wife Of Harlal,

¶7

Mamta D/o Harlal,

¶8

Rameshwar Son Of Harlal,

¶9

Jugraj Son Of Harlal,

¶10

Ucchab Lal Son Of Harlal, All Nos. 1-5 Resident Of Khadipur Police Station Dabi, District Bundi (Rajasthan)

¶11

----Appellants

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Jagdish Singh Chauhan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

¶17

Order

¶18

09/01/2025

¶19

1. izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k nsockbZ] eerk] jkes'oj] tqxjkt] mPNcyky dh vksj ls /kkjk 430 ch-,u-,l-,l- ¼/kkjk 389 na-iz-la-½ ds varxZr] fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky;& ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] cwUnh¼jktLFkku½ ds }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k& 224@2023] muoku jktLFkku jkT; cuke nsockbZ o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o naMkns'k fnukad 17-12-2024 ] ftlds }kjk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vFkZn.M lfgr vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 147] 148] 341] 323@149] 324@149 Hkknl esa vf/kdre 02 o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) ;g ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS]

[2025:RJ-JP:1467]

[SOSA-45/2025]

(2 of 3)

2. cgl lquh xbZA

3. fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk dFku gS fd izLrqr ekeys esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa rFkk muds fo#) mUgsa nks"kfl) djus gsrq i;kZIr lkexzh@lk{; i=koyh ij miyC/k ugha gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vius vkyksP; vkns'k fnukad 17-12-2024 }kjk mlds le{k izLrqr lk{; dk xgurkiwoZd fo'ys"k.k ,oa foospu fd, fcuk gh vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] tks fd fof/klEer ugha gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k fopkj.k ds nkSjku tekur ij vktkn Fks ,oa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mudh ltk ,d ekg ds fy, vLFkk;h rkSj ij LFkfxr dh tk pqdh gS rFkk izLrqr vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxkA vr% mudh ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj djrs gq, mUgsa fjgk fd;k tkosA

¶25

4. blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k djrs gq;s mls [kkfjt djus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶26

5. eSaus i=koyh dk lEekuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k rFkk mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij xaHkhjrkiwoZd euu fd;kA

¶27

6. izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶28

7. ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k 1- nsockbZ iRuh gjyky] 2- eerk iq=h gjyky] 3- jkes'oj iq= gjyky] 4- tqxjkt iq= gjyky] 5- mPNcyky iq= gjyky dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa

¶29

(3 of 3) [SOSA-45/2025]

¶30

[2025:RJ-JP:1467]

¶31

25]000&25000@&:i, ¼v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s½ dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj nsa fd os bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 10-02-2025 dks ,oa rRi'pkr~ tc Hkh mUgsa vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] mifLFkr gksrs jgsxs] rks izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks bl izdj.k esa vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶32

fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ds rgr fn, x, n.Mkns'k ¼sentence½ dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA

¶33

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J

¶34

RAHUL KUMAR KHANDELWAL /49

Devbai Wife of Harlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devbai Wife of Harlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akshay Vats S/O Shri Krishan Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Khurshid Khan Vs State

Jai Prakash Vs State

Smt. Sankari Devi W/O Shri Vicky Sansi Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhawani Singh Rajawat S/O Shri Kishor Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddam Hussain S/O Sh. Jakir Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan