Allowed¶27

Nanu @ Nana Patekhar @ Raja S/O Shri Abdul Lateef v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Jan 2025SOSA/2463/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suspension of sentence; bail pending appeal; Section 430 BNSS; Section 389 CrPC; Sections 452, 324 IPC; Section 4/25 Arms Act; Sessions Case No. 50/2014; CIS No. 105/2015; Special Judge NDPS (ACB) Baran; S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3453/2024; personal bond Rs. 50,000; two sureties Rs. 25,000 each; appearance on 07-02-2025; sentence suspended till final disposal of appeal; Bhuwan Goyal, J.; Rajasthan High Court Jaipur; order dated 06-01-2025; Nanu @ Nana Patekar @ Raja; State of Rajasthan.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of execution of sentence during pendency of the appeal; appellant to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each, with an undertaking to appear before the Court on 07-02-2025 and thereafter as directed. ¶27

Nanu @ Nana Patekhar @ Raja S/O Shri Abdul Lateef Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶27

Issue for consideration

Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant-appellant should be suspended during the pendency of his appeal (application under Section 430 BNSS / Section 389 CrPC).

¶15

Court's answer

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions, and the likelihood of the appeal taking time, and without discussing the merits, the Court found it appropriate to accept the suspension-of-sentence application.

¶23

Ratio / Principle

The suspension-of-sentence application of the applicant-appellant is allowed; he is to be released on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

¶24

Key takeaways

Execution of the sentence awarded by the trial court under the impugned judgment shall remain suspended until final decision of this appeal.ratio¶28

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench (Bhuwan Goyal, J.), order dated 06/01/2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 2463/2024 in S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3453/2024: application under Section 430 BNSS (Section 389 CrPC) by the appellant, convicted on 11-12-2024 by the Special Judge, NDPS (ACB), Baran in Sessions Case No. 50/2014 (CIS No. 105/2015) under Sections 452 and 324 IPC and Section 4/25 Arms Act and sentenced to a maximum of two years' simple imprisonment with fine. Without discussing the merits, and considering the facts, circumstances, submissions and the likelihood of the appeal taking time, the Court allowed the application, suspended execution of the sentence till final decision of the appeal, and directed release on bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each, subject to appearance before the Court on 07-02-2025 and thereafter as directed.

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:597]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 2463/2024

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3453/2024

¶6

Nanu @ Nana Patekar @ Raja S/o Shri Abdul Lateef, Aged About 22 Years, (At Present Age 32 Years), Resident of Rawla Chouk Talabpada, Baran P/s Kotwali, Baran District Baran. (Rajasthan).

¶7

----Appellant

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bhim singh Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, PP With Mr. Kshitiz Tiwari

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

¶13

Order

¶14

06/01/2025

¶15

1. izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ukuw mQZ ukuk ikVsdj mQZ jktk iq= vCnqy yrhQ dh vksj ls /kkjk 430 ch-,u-,l-,l- ¼/kkjk 389 na-iz-la-½ ds varxZr] fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky;& fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] v-tk-@t-tk- ¼v-fu-iz-½ ckjka] ftyk ckjka ¼jkt-½ ds }kjk lS'ku izdj.k la[;k& 50@2014] lh-vkbZ-,l- uEcj& 105@2015] muoku ljdkj cuke ukuw mQZ ukuk ikVsdj esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o naMkns'k fnukad 11-12-2024] ftlds }kjk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 452] 324 Hkk-nala- ,oa /kkjk 4@25 vkElZ ,DV esa nks"kfl) fd;k tkdj vFkZn.M lfgr vf/kdre 02 o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) ;g ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

[2025:RJ-JP:597]

[CRLAS-3453/2024]

(2 of 3)

2. cgl lquh xbZA

3. fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk nkSjkus cgl dFku gS fd izLrqr ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo#) mls nks"kfl) djus gsrq i;kZIr lkexzh@lk{; i=koyh ij miyC/k ugha gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vius vkyksP; vkns'k fnukad 11-12-2024 }kjk mlds le{k izLrqr lk{; dk xgurkiwoZd foospu fd, fcuk gh mDr vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] tks fd fof/klEer ugha gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ls tekur ij vktkn Fkk ,oa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mldh ltk ,d ekg ds fy, vLFkk;h rkSj ij LFkfxr dh tk pqdh gS rFkk izLrqr vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxkA vr% mldk ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj djrs gq, mls fjgk fd;k tkosA

¶21

4. blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k djrs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶22

5. eSaus i=koyh dk lEekuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k rFkk mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij xaHkhjrkiwoZd euu fd;kA

¶23

6. izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶24

7. ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ukuw mQZ ukuk ikVsdj mQZ jktk iq= vCnqy yrhQ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa 25]000&25000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s½ dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj nsa fd og bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad

¶25

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-3453/2024]

¶26

[2025:RJ-JP:597]

¶27

07-02-2025 dks ,oa rRi'pkr~ tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk] rks izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl izdj.k esa vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶28

8. fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ds rgr fn, x, n.Mkns'k ¼sentence½ dk fØ;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA

¶29

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J

¶30

AKSHAY KUMAR PAREEK /79

Nanu @ Nana Patekhar @ Raja S/O Shri Abdul Lateef v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nanu @ Nana Patekhar @ Raja S/O Shri Abdul Lateef v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Son of Shri Manohar Vs State of Rajasthan

Asharam S/O Shri Giriraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Karni Pratap Singh S/O Kalu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamal S/O Omkar Mal Vs State of Rajasthan

Roop Narayan Agarwal Son of Alte Shri Bhuramal Agarwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Satyaveer Singh Son of Rajveer Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan