Partly allowed

Raju Son of Prathya v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Nov 2025SOSA/2249/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the sentence suspension application for three appellants, suspending the imprisonment sentences pending the final disposal of the appeal subject to furnishing bonds. The applications of the other two appellants were dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspension allowed for three appellants subject to personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each. Other applications dismissed.

Raju Son of Prathya Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc Application for suspension of sentence No.

¶3

2249/2025

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2943/2025

¶6

1- Raju Son of Prathya.

¶7

2- Goriya @ Shrichand Son of Raju.

¶8

(At present, the accused is confined in central jail, kota)

¶9

3- Khema Son of Raju.

¶10

(At present, the accused is confined in central jail, kota)

¶11

4- Brahma Son of Raju.

¶12

5- Foru Son of Raju.

¶13

All are residents of Shankarpura, Police Station Dablana, District Bundi(Raj.)

----Appellant

Versus

State Of Rajasthan

----Respondent

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Satish Kumar, Adv. Ms. Renu Verma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, Dy. GA

¶19

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order

¶20

11/11/2025

¶21

1- izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr la[;k&2 o 3 xksfj;k mQZ JhpUn rFkk [ksek dk ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk&i= uksVizsl djrs gSa] vr% mudk ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu uksVizsl fd, tkus ds dkj.k vLohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶22

2- izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k jktw] czg~ek] Qks: dh vksj ls /kkjk 430 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds varxZr] fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky;& ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] cwUnh ¼jktLFkku½ ds }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k& 195@2023] muoku jktLFkku jkT; cuke jktw o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o naMkns'k fnukad 13-10-2025] ftlds }kjk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 143] 341] 323@149 ,oa 325@149 Hkknl esa nks"kfl) dj fuEu naMkns'k ikfjr fd;k

¶23

x;k gS] ds fo:) ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS&

¶24

vijk/k varxZr /kkjk	ltk	vFkZnaM	vne vnk;xh vFkZnaM
143 Hkknl	06 ekg lk/kkj.k	&&	&&

¶25

(2 of 4)

¶26

[SOSA-2249/2025]

¶27

	dkjkokl
341 Hkknl	01 ekg lk/kkj.k dkjkokl	&&	&&
323@149 Hkknl	01 o"kZ lk/kkj.k dkjkokl	&&	&&
325@149 Hkknl	03 o"kZ lk/kkj.k	5000@& #i;s	03 ekg lk/kkj.k
	dkjkokl		dkjkokl

¶28

3- fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls fu;e 311 ¼3½ jktLFkku

¶29

mPp U;k;ky; fu;ekoyh 1952 dk izek.k i= i=koyh esa layXu fd;k x;k gSA

¶30

4- cgl lquh xbZA

¶31

5- fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k jktw] czg~ek o Qks: dk nkSjkus cgl dFku gS fd izLrqr ekeys esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa rFkk mUgsa bl izdj.k esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gS] i=koyh ij mUgsa nks"kfl) djus gsrq i;kZIr lkexzh@lk{; miyC/k ugha gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izdj.k esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ls ?kVukLFky ij va/ksjk gksuk ,oa ekSds ij vfHk;qDrx.k dh igpku LFkkfir ugha gksuk izekf.kr gqvk gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izdj.k esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh dksbZ igpku dk;Zokgh ugha djokbZ xbZ gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd vkgr gfjjke ds c;kuksa e s a xgjk fojks/kkHkkl gS] D;ksafd mlus vius eq[; ijh{k.k esa gkFk o flj ij pksV vkuk vfHkdfFkr fd;k gS] tcfd mlds flj ij fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ pksV gksuk fpfdRld }kjk ugha crk;k x;k gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izdj.k esa QnZ cjkenxh dh dk;Zokgh fo'oluh; ugha gS] D;ksafd mDr lHkh QnksZa ds lk{khx.k iqfyl dkfeZd gSa ,oa vkyk; tjc ij fdlh izdkj ds [kwu ds fu'kku ugha ik, x, gSa] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk vkgrx.k ds lkFk dksbZ ekjihV ugha dh xbZ gS] okLro esa muds eksVjlkbfdy ls fxjus ls pksVsa vkbZ gSa] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us mlds le{k izLrqr lk{; dk xgurkiwoZd foospu fd, fcuk gh mDr vkykSP; vkns'k fnukad 13-10-2025 ikfjr fd;k gS] tks fd fof/klEer ugha gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd

¶32

(3 of 4) [SOSA-2249/2025]

¶33

izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k fopkj.k ds nkSjku tekur ij vktkn Fks ,oa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mldh ltk vLFkk;h rkSj ij LFkfxr dh tk pqdh gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd muds fo:) iwoZ nks"kflf) dh lk{; i=koyh ij miyC/k ugha gS rFkk izLrqr vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% U;k;fgr esa mudk ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkosA

¶34

6- mi jktdh; vf/koDrk us ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k djrs gq, izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk izLrqr ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA 7- eSaus i=koyh dk lEekuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k rFkk mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij xaHkhjrkiwoZd euu fd;kA 8- izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk izLrqr rdksaZ rFkk vihy esa mBk;s x;s dkuwuh eqn~nksa ,oa vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶35

9- ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k 1- jktw iq= iF;k] 2- czg~ek iq= jktw] o 3- Qks: iq= jktw dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa 25]000&25000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s½ dh nks lqn<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj nsa fd os bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 12-12-2025 dks ,oa rRi'pkr~ tc Hkh mUgsa vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] mifLFkr gksrs jgsaxs] rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ds rgr fn, x, dkjkokl ds n.Mkns'k ¼sentence½ dh fØ;kfUorh bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kh tkosA

¶36

[SOSA-2249/2025]

¶37

(4 of 4)

¶38

10vfHk;qDrx.k 1- xksfj;k mQZ JhpUn iq= jktw rFkk 2- [ksek iq= jktw dh vksj ls izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= uksVizsl ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶39

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J

¶40

RAHUL KUMAR KHANDELWAL /56

Raju Son of Prathya v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Son of Prathya v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V S/O Ramlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganesh S/O. Shri Chiranji Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Singh S/O Mohan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Arshad S/O Ameen @ Munna Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mujjaffar Khan Vs State

Buullad @ Sunny Son of Shri Boota Singh Vs State of Rajasthan