Convicted applicant sought suspension of sentence during pendency of appeal, contending false implication and absence of independent recovery witnesses. Court noted ATM card and blood-stained clothes recoveries, found no grounds for suspension, and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:29753-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
In
D.B. Criminal Appeal No.410/2024
Naveen Vaishnav S/o Ramswaroop, Aged 37 Years, Resident Of Retiwada, Sangod, District Kota Rural (Presently In Central Jail At Kota)
----Applicant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Applicant(s) : Mr. Lokesh Parihar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Deputy G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
04/08/2025
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:29753-DB]
[SOSA-2117/2024]
has withdrawn the amount by using ATM card of the deceased and blood-stained clothes of the accused were also recovered by the Police during investigation. Therefore, he prayed for dismissal of the application for suspension of sentence.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Sudeepak/18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the sentence of the convicted accused-applicant should be suspended pending disposal of his criminal appeal.
Naveen Vaishnav
State Of Rajasthan
Inderjeet Singh
Bhuwan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
