Allowed

Monu @ Umesh S/O Shri Dhansingh, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 Nov 2025SOSA/1741/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suspension of sentence application in a criminal appeal against conviction. Sentence of imprisonment suspended during pendency of the appeal subject to deposit of fine; applicant to be released on bail with bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended pending appeal; release on bail on Rs.1,00,000/- personal bond plus two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, subject to depositing fine; appearance fixed for 02.01.2026.

Monu @ Umesh S/O Shri Dhansingh, Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:47517]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1741/2025

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2355/2025

¶6

Monu @ Umesh S/o Shri Dhansingh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Sahajpur Ganwdi, Police Station Sadar Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In District Jail Karauli)

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Chandra Shekhar,Adv.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	VijaySingh Yadav,P.P.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶13

24/11/2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that there is no reliable and legally acceptable evidence to hold the accusedapplicant guilty for the alleged offence(s) and there is every likelihood of succeeding in the criminal appeal. Learned counsel further submits that accused-applicant was on bail during trial and currently he is behind bars. He further submits that accusedapplicant is willing to deposit the entire fine amount and as final

[2025:RJ-JP:47517]

[SOSA-1741/2025]

(2 of 2)

hearing of the appeal is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶21

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶22

Without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case and considering the arguments advanced by the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant.

¶23

Accordingly, subject to deposition of fine imposed by the learned trial Court on the accused-applicant, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence of imprisonment awarded by the learned trial Court to the accused-applicant namely, Monu @ Umesh S/o Shri Dhansingh in Sessions Case No.06/2021 (CIS No.06/2021) shall remain suspended during pendency of the appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this court on 02.01.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶24

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶25

YOGESH KUMAR /25

Monu @ Umesh S/O Shri Dhansingh, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Monu @ Umesh S/O Shri Dhansingh, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhanwar Singh Son of Late Shri Madhu Singh Vs Sumer Singh Son of Late Shri Madhu Singh

Roshni D/O Sanwarmal Vs Gayatri a. Rathore

Suresh Singh Yadav S/O Late Shri Ram Singh Yadav, Vs Shri Kingpaal Singh Rajoria

Ujjainpuri S/O Mahendrapuri Vs Central Bureau of Narcotics

Chunni Lal C/O Kaluram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravindra @ Bhola S/O Parmath Vs the State of Rajasthan