State appealed in a writ matter after a delay of 2213 days, citing a common judgment of the court as justification. The court found the reasons unsatisfactory and no accountability of the responsible officer, refused to condone the delay, dismissed the limitation application and thereby the special appeal itself.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:35800-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 15/2022
----Appellants
Versus
Vijay Kumar Shastri S/o Sh. Gajanand Sharma, R/o Village And Post Satnali, District Mahendragarh (Haryana).
----Respondent
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Order
08/09/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:35800-DB]
[SAW-15/2022]
(2 of 2)
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
HEENA/MAHIMA/28
1 issue framed by the court
Should the delay of 2213 days in filing the Special Appeal (Writ) be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Cum Commissioner, Panchayati Raj Department
Dy. Secretary, Primary-Ii, Panchayati Raj Department
The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jhunjhunu
District Education Officer (Elementary), Jhunjhunu
Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Buhana
Vijay Kumar Shastri S/o Sh. Gajanand Sharma
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjeet Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
