In a Habeas Corpus petition, the petitioner submitted that the time limit had passed for the missing minor corpus. The single-engineered court held the writ petition as infructuous and dismissed it without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:30404-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ (Habeas Corpus) Petition No. 237/2025
Rambabu S/o Shri Tarachand, Aged About 36 Years, R/o House No. 21 Jay Bhawani Nagar Rambag, Needad, Ward No. 01, Harmada, Jaipur Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:30404-DB]
[HC-237/2025]
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG |
| with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG | |
| Mr. Udaibhan, CI SHO, Police Station | |
| Harmada,District Jaipur(West) |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
07/08/2025
Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General has submitted the factual report dated 06.08.2025 furnished to him by SHO Police Station Harmada, District Jaipur (West). The said report is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the report, the corpus is living with the petitioner and submits that by efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous.
Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Sudeepak/14
Rambabu S/o Shri Tarachand
State Of Rajasthan
Inderjeet Singh
Bhuvan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
